Biological control:: An important component in integrated management of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) in caged-layer poultry houses in Buenos Aires, Argentina

被引:41
作者
Crespo, DC
Lecuona, RE
Hogsette, JA
机构
[1] CICA, Inst Microbiol & Zool Agr, RA-1712 Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] CONICET, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] USDA, Ctr Med Agr & Vet Entomol, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Musca domestica; biological control; augmentative release; Spalangia endius; Muscidifurax raptor; IMP; poultry houses;
D O I
10.1006/bcon.1998.0632
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
An Integrated Management program to control Musca domestica L. was developed by evaluating cultural + chemical control, cultural + biological control + granular bait (IMP 1), and cultural + chemical + biological control + granular bait (IMP 2) in poultry houses in Argentina. Adult fly density was estimated by a modified Scudder-grid method. Percentage of house fly parasitism was estimated by direct and indirect methods. Spalangia endius Walker and Muscidifurax raptor Girault & Sanders were released at a rate of 10 parasitoids/hen/week. Complete absence of control practices allowed a sustained growth of the fly population. When larvicides and adulticides were used, the number of adult flies decreased but parasitism was adversely affected. When insecticide use was decreased, the number of flies increased. Cultural + biological control + granular bait (IMP 1) produced a reduction of adults from 14 to 3 flies/grid. Where cultural + chemical + biological control + granular bait (LMP 2) was employed, the adult number was reduced from 40 flies/grid to 1 fly/grid. IMP 2 was efficient for reducing the number of larval development sites in the manure. Percentage parasitism exceeded 90% in both IMP 1 and IMP 2 treatments. IMP 1 and IMP 2 treatments both allowed for maximum control of house flies with minimal use of pesticides. With IMP 2, the potential effectiveness of the biological control agents was maximized by reducing adult fly populations with pesticide sprays, then terminating spray applications before parasitoids were released. Thus, IMP 2 would be most suitable for farms which have large adult house fly populations at the initiation of the treatment. The only pesticide used in LMP 1 was a granular bait. Thus, IMP 1 would be most efficient in situations with low initial adult house fly populations and small amounts of manure tee ensure the success of the cultural strategy. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ABERGCOBO E, 1959, PRIMERA PARTE, P349
[2]  
AXTELL RC, 1986, BIOL CONTROL MUSCOID, V61, P1
[3]   MONITORING HOUSEFLY, MUSCA-DOMESTICA (DIPTERA, MUSCIDAE), POPULATIONS IN CAGED-LAYER POULTRY HOUSES USING A BAITED JUG-TRAP [J].
BURG, JG ;
AXTELL, RC .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1984, 13 (04) :1083-1090
[4]   GENETICS OF ORGANOPHOSPHATE RESISTANCE IN FIELD POPULATIONS OF THE HOUSE-FLY (DIPTERA, MUSCIDAE) [J].
CLUCK, TW ;
PLAPP, FW ;
JOHNSTON, JS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1990, 83 (01) :48-54
[5]  
Del Ponte E, 1958, MANUAL ENTOMOLOGIA M
[6]  
DESANTIS L, 1988, THESIS ACAD NACL CIE
[7]  
DEVANEY J A, 1990, Journal of Economic Entomology, V83, P1446, DOI 10.1093/jee/83.4.1446
[8]   GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF LINKAGE BETWEEN MALATHION RESISTANCE AND AN AUTOSOMAL MALE-DETERMINING FACTOR IN HOUSE-FLY (DIPTERA, MUSCIDAE) [J].
KENCE, M ;
KENCE, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1992, 85 (05) :1566-1570
[9]  
KLUNKER R, 1991, Angewandte Parasitologie, V32, P205
[10]  
MEYER J A, 1987, California Agriculture, V41, P22