Public awareness of and support for infrastructure changes designed to increase walking and biking in Los Angeles County

被引:16
作者
Gase, Lauren N. [1 ]
Barragan, Noel C. [1 ]
Simon, Paul A. [1 ,2 ]
Jackson, Richard J. [3 ]
Kuo, Tony [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Los Angeles Cty Dept Publ Hlth, Div Chron Dis & Injury Prevent, Los Angeles, CA 90010 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
Walking; Bicycling; Active transportation; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; ENVIRONMENTS; POLICIES; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.033
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. Policies to promote active transportation are emerging as a best practice to increase physical activity, yet relatively little is known about public opinion on utilizing transportation funds for such investments. This study sought to assess public awareness of and support for investments in walking and biking infrastructure in Los Angeles County. Method In the fall of 2013, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health conducted a telephone survey with a random sample of registered voters in the region. The survey asked respondents to report on the presence and importance of walking and biking infrastructure in their community, travel behaviors and preferences, and demographics. Results. One thousand and five interviews were completed (response rate 20%, cooperation rate 54%). The majority of participants reported walking, biking, and bus/rail transportation investments as being important. In addition, participants reported a high level of support for redirecting transportation funds to active transportation investment the population average was 3.28 (between 'strongly' and 'somewhat' support) on a 4 point Likert scale. Conclusion. Voters see active transportation infrastructure as being very important and support redirecting funding to improve the infrastructure. These findings can inform policy-decisions and planning efforts in the jurisdiction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 75
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting
    Abelson, J
    Eyles, J
    McLeod, CB
    Collins, P
    McMullan, C
    Forest, PG
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2003, 66 (01) : 95 - 106
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, National Prevention Strategy
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, COMM PUTT PREV WORK
  • [4] [Anonymous], 282 I MED
  • [5] [Anonymous], REC IMPR HLTH TRANSP
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY
  • [7] [Anonymous], CAL HOUS TRAV SURV
  • [8] [Anonymous], FACTS PHYS ACT
  • [9] Support for policy interventions to increase physical activity in rural Missouri
    Brownson, RC
    Schmid, TL
    King, AC
    Eyler, AA
    Pratt, M
    Murayi, T
    Mayer, JP
    Brown, DR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1998, 12 (04) : 263 - 266
  • [10] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011, COMM TRANSF GRANTS