Lexical prediction in language comprehension: a replication study of grammatical gender effects in Dutch

被引:33
作者
Kochari, Arnold R. [1 ,2 ]
Flecken, Monique [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Log Language & Computat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Neurobiol Language Dept, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Language comprehension; lexical prediction; grammatical gender; ERP; Dutch; BRAIN POTENTIALS; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; WORD RECOGNITION; EVENT KNOWLEDGE; UPCOMING WORDS; ACTIVATION; ERP; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION; EXPECTANCY;
D O I
10.1080/23273798.2018.1524500
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
An important question in predictive language processing is the extent to which prediction effects can reliably be measured on pre-nominal material (e.g. articles before nouns). Here, we present a large sample (N = 58) close replication of a study by Otten and van Berkum (2009). They report ERP modulations in relation to the predictability of nouns in sentences, measured on gender-marked Dutch articles. We used nearly identical materials, procedures, and data analysis steps. We fail to replicate the original effect, but do observe a pattern consistent with the original data. Methodological differences between our replication and the original study that could potentially have contributed to the diverging results are discussed. In addition, we discuss the suitability of Dutch gender-marked determiners as a test-case for future studies of pre-activation of lexical items.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 253
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]   What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? [J].
Kuperberg, Gina R. ;
Jaeger, T. Florian .
LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 31 (01) :32-59
[22]   Is it or isn't it: Listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings [J].
Kurumada, Chigusa ;
Brown, Meredith ;
Bibyk, Sarah ;
Pontillo, Daniel F. ;
Tanenhaus, Michael K. .
COGNITION, 2014, 133 (02) :335-342
[23]   READING SENSELESS SENTENCES - BRAIN POTENTIALS REFLECT SEMANTIC INCONGRUITY [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4427) :203-205
[24]   BRAIN POTENTIALS DURING READING REFLECT WORD EXPECTANCY AND SEMANTIC ASSOCIATION [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
NATURE, 1984, 307 (5947) :161-163
[25]   Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP) [J].
Kutas, Marta ;
Federmeier, Kara D. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 62, 2011, 62 :621-647
[26]   A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context [J].
Laszlo, Sarah ;
Federmeier, Kara D. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2009, 61 (03) :326-338
[27]   Spatiotemporal Signatures of Lexical-Semantic Prediction [J].
Lau, Ellen F. ;
Weber, Kirsten ;
Gramfort, Alexandre ;
Haemaelaeinen, Matti S. ;
Kuperberg, Gina R. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2016, 26 (04) :1377-1387
[28]   Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts [J].
Lau, Ellen F. ;
Holcomb, Phillip J. ;
Kuperberg, Gina R. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 25 (03) :484-502
[29]   How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't) [J].
Luck, Steven J. ;
Gaspelin, Nicholas .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 (01) :146-157
[30]   Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension [J].
Metusalem, Ross ;
Kutas, Marta ;
Urbach, Thomas P. ;
Hare, Mary ;
McRae, Ken ;
Elman, Jeffrey L. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2012, 66 (04) :545-567