US clinicians' perspectives on how mifepristone regulations affect access to medication abortion and early pregnancy loss care in primary care

被引:25
作者
Srinivasulu, Silpa [1 ]
Yavari, Roya [2 ]
Brubaker, Libby [2 ]
Riker, Laura [1 ]
Prine, Linda [1 ,2 ]
Rubin, Susan E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Reprod Hlth Access Project, New York, NY 10025 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
Mifepristone; Medication abortion; Miscarriage; Early pregnancy loss; Primary care; Access; PATIENT EXPERIENCES; LOSS MANAGEMENT; UNITED-STATES; MISCARRIAGE; HEALTH; PROVISION; SERVICES; BARRIERS; RATES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Protocols including mifepristone are the most effective medication regimens for medication abortion and early pregnancy loss (EPL) management. Both can be safely and effectively offered in primary care settings. Despite mifepristone's excellent safety record, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) heavily regulates provision. This exploratory study examines US primary care clinicians' perspectives on the effects of mifepristone restrictions, including FDA regulations, on access to medication abortion and EPL management in primary care. Study Design: In 2019, we conducted an online qualitative survey of US primary care clinicians recruited from six reproductive health-focused listservs. Open-ended questions queried about barriers to providing mifepristone and effects on patients when unable to access mifepristone in primary care. We iteratively coded and analyzed qualitative data using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Of our analytic sample of 113 respondents, one-third had mifepristone available in their current primary practice setting. Key barriers to provision stemmed from the FDA rule to stock and dispense mifepristone onsite, including logistical difficulties and resistance from health center leadership. Clinicians believed that lack of mifepristone in primary care resulted in negative patient experiences, including disrupted continuity of care, medically-unnecessary appointments, and undesired aspiration procedures. Conclusions: FDA regulations that inhibit mifepristone provision in primary care create structural barriers to provision. This may result in physical, emotional, and financial burdens for patients. Implications: When mifepristone is unavailable in primary care, some patients in need of abortion or EPL care may experience physical, emotional, and financial harms. Removing FDA restrictions is a critical step in reducing primary care barriers to mifepristone provision and improving access to timely, patient centered medication abortion and EPL care. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
American Civil Liberties Union, ACC DEN OR HYD AM OT
[2]   Early Pregnancy Loss [J].
Prager, Sarah ;
Dalton, Vanessa K. ;
Allen, Rebecca H. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (05) :E197-E207
[3]  
Block A, 2017, FAM MED, V49, P706
[4]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative research in psychology, V3, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[5]  
Bronfenbrenner Urie., 1979, The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design, V352, DOI [10.2307/j.ctv26071r6, DOI 10.2307/J.CTV26071R6]
[6]   Mifepristone restrictions and primary care: Breaking the cycle of stigma through a learning collaborative model in the United States [J].
Calloway, Danielle ;
Stulberg, Debra B. ;
Janiak, Elizabeth .
CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 104 (01) :24-28
[7]   "We have to what?": lessons learned about engaging support staff in an interprofessional intervention to implement MVA for management of spontaneous abortion [J].
Darney, Blair G. ;
VanDerhei, Deborah ;
Weaver, Marcia R. ;
Stevens, Nancy G. ;
Prager, Sarah W. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (02) :221-225
[8]   Barriers and Enablers to Family Physicians' Provision of Early Pregnancy Loss Management in the United States [J].
deFiebre, Gabrielle ;
Srinivasulu, Silpa ;
Maldonado, Lisa ;
Romero, Diana ;
Prine, Linda ;
Rubin, Susan E. .
WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2021, 31 (01) :57-64
[9]   Disparities in Abortion Rates: A Public Health Approach [J].
Dehlendorf, Christine ;
Harris, Lisa H. ;
Weitz, Tracy A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (10) :1772-1779
[10]   Barriers to and Facilitators of Moving Miscarriage Management Out of the Operating Room [J].
Dennis, Amanda ;
Fuentes, Liza ;
Douglas-Durham, Ella ;
Grossman, Daniel .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2015, 47 (03) :138-146