Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options

被引:64
作者
Arif, Nadia [1 ]
Ghezzi, Pietro [1 ]
机构
[1] Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Falmer BN19RY, England
关键词
Internet; Google; Health information quality; Information quality; Online; Breast cancer; WORLD-WIDE-WEB; PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS; HEALTH INFORMATION; DECISION-MAKING; READABILITY; INTERNET; ACCESSIBILITY; WEBSITES; PREFERENCES; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Offering breast cancer patients treatment choice has become a priority as the involvement of patients in the decision-making process is associated with improved physical and psychological outcomes. As the Internet is increasingly being used by patients as a source of medical information, it is important to evaluate the quality of information relating to breast cancer on the Internet. We analysed 200 websites returned by google.co.uk searching "breast cancer treatment options" in terms of their typology and treatment options described. These were related to standard measures of health information quality such as the JAMA score and the presence of quality certifications, as well as readability. We found that health portals were of higher quality whilst commercial and professional websites were of poorer quality in terms of JAMA criteria. Overall, readability was higher than previously reported for other conditions, and Google ranked websites with better readability higher. Most websites discussed surgical and medical treatments. Few websites, with a large proportion being of commercial typology, discussed complementary and alternative medicine. Google ranked professional websites low whilst websites from non-profit organizations were promoted in the ranking. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 12
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The Principles of Readability
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HAND, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11552-012-9443-Z
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ICT US ACC IND HOUS
[4]   Online Information on Antioxidants: Information Quality Indicators, Commercial Interests, and Ranking by Google [J].
Aslam, Romaan ;
Gibbons, Daniel ;
Ghezzi, Pietro .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 5
[5]   An analysis of the readability characteristics of oral health information literature available to the public in Tasmania, Australia [J].
Barnett, Tony ;
Hoang, Ha ;
Furlan, Ashlea .
BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2016, 16
[6]   Health information on the Internet -: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish [J].
Berland, GK ;
Elliott, MN ;
Morales, LS ;
Algazy, JI ;
Kravitz, RL ;
Broder, MS ;
Kanouse, DE ;
Muñoz, JA ;
Puyol, JA ;
Lara, M ;
Watkins, KE ;
Yang, H ;
McGlynn, EA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (20) :2612-2621
[7]   The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites [J].
Boyer, C ;
Selby, M ;
Scherrer, JR ;
Appel, RD .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (05) :603-610
[8]   Health literacy and the Clozapine patient [J].
Brosnan, Susan ;
Barron, Elizabeth ;
Sahm, L. J. .
PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 132 (01) :39-42
[9]   Quality of online information to support patient decision-making in breast cancer surgery [J].
Bruce, Jordan G. ;
Tucholka, Jennifer L. ;
Steffens, Nicole M. ;
Neuman, Heather B. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (06) :575-580
[10]   Changing trends in the decision-making preferences of women with early breast cancer [J].
Caldon, L. J. M. ;
Walters, S. J. ;
Reed, M. W. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) :312-318