Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality

被引:30
作者
Oh, Hyun-Taek [1 ]
Lee, Woo-Sung [1 ]
Ju, Youngsan [1 ]
Lee, Chang-Ha [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
IGCC; Performance evaluation; Carbon assessment; Coal type; Cost of electricity; Carbon capture and storage; GASIFICATION COMBINED-CYCLE; POSTCOMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE; ENTRAINED-FLOW GASIFIER; IRREVERSIBILITY REDUCTION; NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION; FUTURE GENERATION; AIR SEPARATION; GAS-TURBINE; INTEGRATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2019.116063
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Techno-economic and environmental impacts of coal type were evaluated using a 500 MW-class integrated coal gasification combined cycle(IGCC), including reheat combined cycle process with three-pressure level based on higher than 99.9% sulfur removal and 90% carbon capture. Efficiency and cost of electricity(COE) of four different coals in the IGCC power plant were compared: two bituminous and two sub-bituminous coals. As coal with higher heating value per unit weight was fed into a gasifier, higher cold gas efficiency of the gasifier and greater net overall plant efficiency was achieved. The highest overall plant efficiency of 31.62% could be achieved by using bituminous. Raw water consumption was also affected by the moisture content of the as-received coal. The as-received coal with the highest moisture content consumed the least amount of water. The exergy flow and destruction were presented in Grassmann diagrams to provide more detailed information on main units. However, according to the sensitivity test, the COE was mainly influenced by fuel prices and costs of CO2 transport and storage. If the price difference between bituminous coals and sub-bituminous coals is reduced, the utilization of bituminous coals becomes more competitive in terms of COE and capital cost. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]  
Conti J., 2016, INT ENERGY OUTLOOK 2
[12]   Multi-fuel multi-product operation of IGCC power plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS) [J].
Cormos, Ana-Maria ;
Dinca, Cristian ;
Cormos, Calin-Cristian .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 74 :20-27
[13]   Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS) [J].
Cormos, Calin-Cristian .
ENERGY, 2012, 42 (01) :434-445
[14]   Performance improvement of a coal gasification and combined cogeneration plant by multi-pressure steam generation [J].
De, S ;
Biswal, SK .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 24 (2-3) :449-456
[15]   Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion [J].
Erlach, B. ;
Schmidt, M. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (06) :3804-3815
[16]   Baseline Flowsheet Model for IGCC with Carbon Capture [J].
Field, Randall P. ;
Brasington, Robert .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (19) :11306-11312
[17]  
Fout T, 2015, COST PERFORMANCE BAS
[18]   An advanced cryogenic air separation process based on self heat recuperation for CO2 separation [J].
Fu, Qian ;
Kansha, Yasuki ;
Song, Chunfeng ;
Liu, Yuping ;
Ishizuka, Masanori ;
Tsutsumi, Atsushi .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 :1673-1676
[19]   CO2 capture in integrated gasification combined cycle with SEWGS - Part A: Thermodynamic performances [J].
Gazzani, Matteo ;
Macchi, Ennio ;
Manzolini, Giampaolo .
FUEL, 2013, 105 :206-219
[20]  
Haar L., 1984, NBS/NRC Steam tables. Thermodynamic and Transport Properties and Computer Programs for Vapor and Liquid States of Water in SI Units