Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality

被引:30
作者
Oh, Hyun-Taek [1 ]
Lee, Woo-Sung [1 ]
Ju, Youngsan [1 ]
Lee, Chang-Ha [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
IGCC; Performance evaluation; Carbon assessment; Coal type; Cost of electricity; Carbon capture and storage; GASIFICATION COMBINED-CYCLE; POSTCOMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE; ENTRAINED-FLOW GASIFIER; IRREVERSIBILITY REDUCTION; NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION; FUTURE GENERATION; AIR SEPARATION; GAS-TURBINE; INTEGRATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2019.116063
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Techno-economic and environmental impacts of coal type were evaluated using a 500 MW-class integrated coal gasification combined cycle(IGCC), including reheat combined cycle process with three-pressure level based on higher than 99.9% sulfur removal and 90% carbon capture. Efficiency and cost of electricity(COE) of four different coals in the IGCC power plant were compared: two bituminous and two sub-bituminous coals. As coal with higher heating value per unit weight was fed into a gasifier, higher cold gas efficiency of the gasifier and greater net overall plant efficiency was achieved. The highest overall plant efficiency of 31.62% could be achieved by using bituminous. Raw water consumption was also affected by the moisture content of the as-received coal. The as-received coal with the highest moisture content consumed the least amount of water. The exergy flow and destruction were presented in Grassmann diagrams to provide more detailed information on main units. However, according to the sensitivity test, the COE was mainly influenced by fuel prices and costs of CO2 transport and storage. If the price difference between bituminous coals and sub-bituminous coals is reduced, the utilization of bituminous coals becomes more competitive in terms of COE and capital cost. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Off-design point modelling of a 420 MW CCGT power plant integrated with an amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture and compression process [J].
Adams, T. ;
Mac Dowell, N. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 178 :681-702
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2012
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CO2 EM FUEL COMB HIG
[4]   Performance evaluation of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) utilizing a blended solution of ammonia and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) for CO2 capture [J].
Asif, Muhammad ;
Bak, Chul-u ;
Saleem, Muhammad Wajid ;
Kim, Woo-Seung .
FUEL, 2015, 160 :513-524
[5]   Modeling, numerical optimization, and irreversibility reduction of a triple-pressure reheat combined cycle [J].
Bassily, A. M. .
ENERGY, 2007, 32 (05) :778-794
[6]   Modeling, numerical optimization, and irreversibility reduction of a dual-pressure reheat combined-cycle [J].
Bassily, AM .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2005, 81 (02) :127-151
[7]   Performance of an IGCC Plant with Carbon Capture and Coal-CO2-Slurry Feed: Impact of Coal Rank, Slurry Loading, and Syngas Cooling Technology [J].
Botero, Cristina ;
Field, Randall P. ;
Brasington, Robert D. ;
Herzog, Howard J. ;
Ghoniem, Ahmed F. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (36) :11778-11790
[8]   A comparison between exergetic and economic criteria for optimizing the heat recovery steam generators of gas-steam power plants [J].
Carapellucci, Roberto ;
Giordano, Lorena .
ENERGY, 2013, 58 :458-472
[9]   CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost [J].
Chen, Chao ;
Rubin, Edward S. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) :915-924
[10]  
Chou V, 2014, DOENETL341051314