Evaluating the application of the multi-view spatial data infrastructure assessment framework

被引:1
作者
Grus, L. [1 ]
Crompvoets, J. [1 ,2 ]
Bregt, A. K. [1 ]
van Loenen, B. [3 ]
Fernandez, Tatiana Delgado
Vandenbroucke, D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Ctr Geoinformat, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Publ Management Inst, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Delft Univ Technol, OTB Res Inst Housing Urban & Mobil Studies, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Spatial Applicat Div, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Spatial Data Infrastructures assessment; assessment framework; metaevaluation; SDI;
D O I
10.1080/14498596.2011.567438
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
As a response to the growing interest in assessing Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs) the Multi-view SDI assessment framework has been proposed. The Multi-view SDI assessment framework collects multiple assessment approaches and methods with the aim to assess many different aspects of SDI in a comprehensive and unbiased way. Despite the potential strengths of the framework, its complex design raises concerns about its usability and applicability for SDI assessment. In this article we evaluate the application of the Multi-view SDI assessment framework. In addition, we ask the potential users of the framework to evaluate its applicability to assess SDIs. The results show that the framework could be applied to 21 National SDIs. Evaluation of the application process reveals that the completeness of assessment data and time needed to measure indicators depends strongly on the assessment methods used. It is recommended to use those methods that need less time to measure assessment indicators. The results also show that a significant part of the measurements could not be done due to survey questions not being filled in by the respondents. The results also show that the users tend to agree with the applicability of the Multi-view SDI assessment framework to assess SDIs.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 141
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SPATIAL DATA INFRAST
  • [2] Bernard HR., 2006, Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches, V4
  • [3] Cillers P., 1998, COMPLEXITY POSTMODER
  • [4] Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses
    Crompvoets, J
    Bregt, A
    Rajabifard, A
    Williamson, I
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2004, 18 (07) : 665 - 689
  • [5] Crompvoets J., 2006, National Spatial Data Clearinghouses, worldwide development and impact
  • [6] Crompvoets J., 2007, URISA Journal, V19, P23
  • [7] Crompvoets J., 2008, A Multi-view Framework to Assess Spatial Data Infrastructures, P135
  • [8] Understanding SDI; complexity and institutionalization
    De Man, WHE
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2006, 20 (03) : 329 - 343
  • [9] Delgado Fernandez T., 2005, P FIG WORK WEEK 2005
  • [10] Eoyang G.H., 1998, Managing Complexity in Organizations