In vitro study of FFR, QCA, and IVUS for the assessment of optimal stent deployment

被引:13
作者
Matthys, K
Carlier, S
Segers, P
Ligthart, J
Sianos, G
Serrano, P
Verdonck, PR
Serruys, PW
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Hydraul Lab, Inst Biomed Technol IBITECH, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ctr Thorax, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
flow reserve; intravascular ultrasound; angiography; suboptimal stent deployment;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.1301
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We tested whether fractional flow reserve (FFR) discriminates between suboptimally and optimally deployed stents. Latex tubes (diameter circle divide = 4 mm) with diameter stenosis 40% (n = 3), 50% (n = 3) and 60% (n = 3) were tested in a pulsatile flow system, using water. Measurements were done at baseline (n = 9; FFR/QCA) and after suboptimal (SOD; 3-mm balloon at 8 atm) and optimal (OD; 4 mm balloon at 16 atm) deployment of a 35-mm stent (n = 6; FFR/OCA/IVUS). Varying Q from 150 to 50 ml/min increased FFR by 2-7%. Conversely, at 100 ml/min, FFR increased by only 0.8% from SOD to OD (P < 0.05). Extrapolating data to blood flow, the gain in FFR from SOD to OD is less than 5% for Q = 100 ml/min, while FFR may increase by 15-20% by changes in blood flow from 50 to 150 ml/min. We conclude that IVUS and OCA are more appropriate for the assessment of optimal stent deployment. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 375
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1961, HDB FLUID DYNAMICS
[2]  
[Anonymous], J VASC INVEST
[3]   Coronary Flow reserve versus geometric measurements of coronary dimensions: Advantages and limitations of the functional stenosis assessment [J].
Carlier, SG ;
Van Langenhove, G ;
Lupotti, F ;
Albertal, M ;
Mastik, F ;
Bom, K ;
Serruys, PW .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 12 (06) :411-424
[4]   Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment - Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study) [J].
de Jaegere, P ;
Mudra, H ;
Figulla, H ;
Almagor, Y ;
Doucet, S ;
Penn, I ;
Colombo, A ;
Hamm, C ;
Bartorelli, A ;
Rothman, M ;
Nobuyoshi, M ;
Yamaguchi, T ;
Voudris, V ;
DiMario, C ;
Makovski, S ;
Hausmann, D ;
Rowe, S ;
Rabinovich, S ;
Sunamura, M ;
van Es, GA .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1998, 19 (08) :1214-1223
[5]   TRANSSTENOTIC CORONARY PRESSURE-GRADIENT MEASUREMENT IN HUMANS - IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO EVALUATION OF A NEW PRESSURE MONITORING ANGIOPLASTY GUIDE-WIRE [J].
DEBRUYNE, B ;
PIJLS, NHJ ;
PAULUS, WJ ;
VANTRIMPONT, PJ ;
SYS, SU ;
HEYNDRICKX, GR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (01) :119-126
[6]   CORONARY FLOW RESERVE CALCULATED FROM PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN HUMANS - VALIDATION WITH POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
DEBRUYNE, B ;
BAUDHUIN, T ;
MELIN, JA ;
PIJLS, NHJ ;
SYS, SU ;
BOL, A ;
PAULUS, WJ ;
HEYNDRICKX, GR ;
WIJNS, W .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 89 (03) :1013-1022
[7]  
DeScheerder IK, 1997, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V42, P339
[8]   Clinical application and image interpretation in intracoronary ultrasound [J].
Di Mario, C ;
Gorge, G ;
Peters, R ;
Kearney, P ;
Pinto, F ;
Hausmann, D ;
von Birgelen, C ;
Colombo, A ;
Mudra, H ;
Roelandt, J ;
Erbel, R .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1998, 19 (02) :207-229
[9]   Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment [J].
Hanekamp, CEE ;
Koolen, JJ ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Michels, HR ;
Bonnier, HJRM .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (08) :1015-1021
[10]   Effects of intravenous and intracoronary adenosine 5′-triphosphate as compared with adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics [J].
Jeremias, A ;
Filardo, SD ;
Whitbourn, RJ ;
Kernoff, RS ;
Yeung, AC ;
Fitzgerald, PJ ;
Yock, PG .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (03) :318-323