Comparative study and validation of three quantitative PCR (qPCR) techniques for the diagnosis of African Swine Fever

被引:2
作者
Ribeiro, Eduardo L. [1 ]
Oliveira, Anna G. G. [1 ]
Laguardia-Nascimento, Mateus [1 ]
Silveira Martins da Mata, Camila Pacheco [2 ]
dos Reis, Jenner K. P. [2 ]
Fonseca Junior, Antonio A. [1 ]
机构
[1] MAPA, Lab Biol Mol, Lab Nacl Agr Lnagro, Rua Romulo Joviano S-N, BR-33600000 Pedro Leopoldo, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Med Vet Prevent, Escola Vet, Av Pres Antonio Carlos 6627, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA | 2016年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
PCR Real-Time; African swine fever virus; validation; REAL-TIME PCR; ASSAY; OUTBREAK; VIRUS;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-736X2016000600003
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the performance of three real time PCR techniques (qPCR) for the diagnosis of African Swine Fever in tissue samples. The three chosen techniques are based on amplification of viral protein VP72 gene sequences and are recommended by OIE (PSA-OIE), the United States official laboratories (PSA-USDA) and the European Union (PSA- EU). Target sequences of the viral DNA were inserted into synthetic plasmid, which served as a positive control for the standardization of techniques and optimization of reagents, determination of limits of detection and performance verification testing. To gauge repeatability and reproducibility of techniques, standard procedures were repeated on different days by two analysts and by changing mix reagents and equipment, and also by another laboratory. Analytical sensitivity tests were done with reference samples provided by an OIE reference laboratory and analytical and diagnostic specificity were tested with negative samples. The PSA-EU and PSA-USDA techniques were more advantageous to use because of lower concentration of oligos used. There were no significant differences in quantitative results varying the days of tests, analysts, equipment and the mix of reagents. The three techniques had high analytical and diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. The three qPCR techniques were considered equivalent and effective and can be adopted by any laboratory for issuing official diagnosis of African Swine Fever.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 478
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Albano F.M., 2009, J CLIN MICROBIOL
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, VALIDACAO GARANTIA Q
  • [3] Genotyping field strains of African swine fever virus by partial p72 gene characterisation
    Bastos, ADS
    Penrith, ML
    Crucière, C
    Edrich, JL
    Hutchings, G
    Roger, F
    Couacy-Hymann, E
    Thomson, GR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2003, 148 (04) : 693 - 706
  • [4] Multi-platform comparison of ten commercial master mixes for probe-based real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of bioterrorism threat agents for surge preparedness
    Buzard, Gregory S.
    Baker, Daniel
    Wolcott, Mark J.
    Norwood, David A.
    Dauphin, Leslie A.
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 223 (1-3) : 292 - 297
  • [5] Laboratory methods to study African swine fever virus
    de Leon, Patricia
    Bustos, Maria J.
    Carrascosa, Angel L.
    [J]. VIRUS RESEARCH, 2013, 173 (01) : 168 - 179
  • [6] Dixon L.K., 2000, Virus taxonomy: Classification and nomenclature of virus. Seventh Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, P159
  • [7] Done S, 2001, IN PRACTICE, V23, P14
  • [8] Fernandez-Pinero J, 2010, ANN M NAT AFR SWIN F
  • [9] Fonseca Jr A.A., 2015, MANUAL VERIFICACAO D
  • [10] Real time PCR for detection of Aujeszky's disease virus
    Fonseca Junior, A. A.
    Cotorello, A. C.
    Dias, N. L.
    D'Ambros, R.
    Leite, R. C.
    Heneimann, M. B.
    Reis, J. K. P.
    [J]. ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2013, 65 (03) : 801 - 808