Model development for EHR interdisciplinary information exchange of ICU common goals

被引:52
作者
Collins, Sarah A. [1 ]
Bakken, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
Vawdrey, David K. [1 ]
Coiera, Enrico [3 ]
Currie, Leanne [4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Hlth Informat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, UBC Sch Nursing T201, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
关键词
Model development; Interdisciplinary communication; Intensive care unit; Electronic health record; INTENSIVE-CARE; COLLABORATION; PHYSICIANS; COGNITION; NURSES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.009
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose: Effective interdisciplinary exchange of patient information is an essential component of safe, efficient, and patient-centered care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Frequent handoffs of patient care, high acuity of patient illness, and the increasing amount of available data complicate information exchange. Verbal communication can be affected by interruptions and time limitations. To supplement verbal communication, many ICUs rely on documentation in electronic health records (EHRs) to reduce errors of omission and information loss. The purpose of this study was to develop a model of EHR interdisciplinary information exchange of ICU common goals. Methods: The theoretical frameworks of distributed cognition and the clinical communication space were integrated and a previously published categorization of verbal information exchange was used. 59.5 h of interdisciplinary rounds in a neurovascular ICU were observed and five interviews and one focus group with ICU nurses and physicians were conducted. Results: Current documentation tools in the ICU were not sufficient to capture the nurses' and physicians' collaborative decision-making and verbal communication of goal-directed actions and interactions. Clinicians perceived the EHR to be inefficient for information retrieval, leading to a further reliance on verbal information exchange. Conclusion: The model suggests that EHRs should support: (1) information tools for the explicit documentation of goals, interventions, and assessments with synthesized and summarized information outputs of events and updates; and (2) messaging tools that support collaborative decision-making and patient safety double checks that currently occur between nurses and physicians in the absence of EHR support. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e141 / e149
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, PERSPECTIVES SOCIALL
[2]   Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis [J].
Arora, V ;
Johnson, J ;
Lovinger, D ;
Humphrey, HJ ;
Meltzer, DO .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 14 (06) :401-407
[3]  
Baggs JG, 1997, RES NURS HEALTH, V20, P71, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199702)20:1<71::AID-NUR8>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-R
[5]   Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience [J].
Brod, Meryl ;
Tesler, Laura E. ;
Christensen, Torsten L. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (09) :1263-1278
[6]   When conversation is better than computation [J].
Coiera, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2000, 7 (03) :277-286
[7]  
Collins S, 2007, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V129, P958
[8]   Profiles in patient safety: Authority gradients in medical error [J].
Cosby, KS ;
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (12) :1341-1345
[9]  
Cresswell Kathrin, 2009, Inform Prim Care, V17, P153
[10]   Understanding communication networks in the emergency department [J].
Creswick, Nerida ;
Westbrook, Johanna I. ;
Braithwaite, Jeffrey .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 9