Deriving hydrological parameters for modeling water flow under field conditions

被引:11
|
作者
Zavattaro, L [1 ]
Grignani, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dipartimento Agron Selvicotura & Gestione Territo, I-10095 Grugliasco, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2001.653655x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The process of deriving the hydrological characteristics of a soil to parameterize a model at the Field scale is not straightforward, especially when various experimental procedures are used to estimate the parameter values. This paper shows the inconsistencies that were encountered when attempting to find the physical and hydrological parameters of two deep loam soils. The parameters were searched for with the aim, and the constraint, of compiling the input file of the LEACHM model, which implements a Campbell's modified K-theta-psi function approach. The soil water content at saturation was not consistent with the total porosity calculated from measured bulk and particle densities. The water retention curve (RC) measured in the laboratory and the conductivity curve measured in the field were described using modified Campbell functions that were separately parameterized, and results were then compared. The optimized values obtained for the theta-psi curve were remarkably different from those for the K-psi curve. Considering the physical nature of a model and the measurability of its parameters as the basic requirements for extending model predictions to sites where validation cannot be provided, possible solutions are to derive all soil properties simultaneously on the same sample and/or with a cofitting procedure, to adjust the measured values of the soil properties to the functional values, in order to combine the measured soil properties with the code requirements, and to modify the code to allow a separate parameterization of the two curves.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 667
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptive hydrological flow field modeling based on water body extraction and surface information
    Puttinaovarat, Supattra
    Horkaew, Paramate
    Khaimook, Kanit
    Polnigongit, Weerapong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 9
  • [2] Advances in Flow Modeling for Water Resources and Hydrological Engineering
    Costanzo, Carmelina
    Padulano, Roberta
    Caloiero, Tommaso
    HYDROLOGY, 2022, 9 (12)
  • [3] Solute transport modeling under variably saturated water flow conditions
    Suarez, DL
    Simunek, J
    REACTIVE TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 1996, 34 : 229 - 268
  • [4] Hydrological modeling to simulate stream flow under changing climate conditions in Jhelum catchment, western Himalaya
    Jasrotia, Avtar Singh
    Baru, Deepika
    Kour, Retinder
    Ahmad, Suhail
    Kour, Kuljit
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 593 (593)
  • [5] Hydrodynamic and Flow Field Characteristics of Water Jet Propulsion under Mooring Conditions
    Zhao, Dagang
    Zhang, Yang
    He, Qian
    Sun, Cong
    Bi, Mingqi
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [6] MODELING PREFERENTIAL FLOW OF WATER IN SOILS - A 2-PHASE APPROACH FOR FIELD CONDITIONS
    HOSANG, J
    GEODERMA, 1993, 58 (3-4) : 149 - 163
  • [7] Evaluating Hydrological Models for Deriving Water Resources in Peninsular Spain
    Perez-Sanchez, Julio
    Senent-Aparicio, Javier
    Segura-Mendez, Francisco
    Pulido-Velazquez, David
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10)
  • [8] Modeling the flow of water on aircraft in icing conditions
    Myers, TG
    Thompson, CP
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (06) : 1010 - 1013
  • [9] Modeling of salinity intrusion under different hydrological conditions in the Arvand River Estuary
    Zahed, Fatemeh
    Etemad-Shahidi, Amir
    Jabbari, Ebrahim
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2008, 35 (12) : 1476 - 1480
  • [10] Water allocation assessment in low flow river under data scarce conditions: A study of hydrological simulation in Mediterranean basin
    Bangash, Rubab F.
    Passuello, Ana
    Hammond, Michael
    Schuhmacher, Marta
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 440 : 60 - 71