Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction

被引:44
|
作者
Karaliotas, Constantine [1 ]
Sgourakis, George [1 ]
Goumas, Constantine [2 ]
Papaioannou, Nickolaos [1 ]
Lilis, Constantine [1 ]
Leandros, Emmanouel [3 ]
机构
[1] Red Cross Hosp, Surg Dept Korgialen Benak 2, Athens 15451, Greece
[2] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol Korgialen Benak, Athens 15451, Greece
[3] Natl Kappodistrian Univ, Propaedeut Surg Dept 1, Hippocrat Hosp, Athens, Greece
关键词
choledocholithiasis; endoscopic stone extraction; laparoscopic cbd exploration; laparoscopic choledochotomy;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-007-9708-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Our objective was to present the technical aspects and results of laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration following failed endoscopic stone extraction. Method From April 1997 to December 2006, 32 patients were referred to us after unsuccessful attempts at endoscopic CBD stone extraction. Transcholedochal laparoscopic CBD exploration was used in all patients. Previous operations, several pathologic entities, and stone impaction were studied as potential predictors of failure of the laparoscopic approach. Results Previous operations, cholangitis, anatomic abnormalities, and stone impaction were the principal reasons for failure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Stone extraction under direct laparoscopic choledochotomy was achieved in 20 of 31 patients (64.51%). Biliary stents were inserted in 7 patients (21.8%) and T tubes were placed in 21 patients (65.6%). Five laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomies were performed. There were 11 conversions to open surgery. Morbidity was 12.5%. Conclusions Laparoscopic choledochotomy is an efficacious procedure in dealing with unsuccessful endoscopic CBD clearance.
引用
收藏
页码:1826 / 1831
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction
    Constantine Karaliotas
    George Sgourakis
    Constantine Goumas
    Nickolaos Papaioannou
    Constantine Lilis
    Emmanouel Leandros
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 1826 - 1831
  • [2] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction
    Poole, G
    Waldron, B
    Shimi, SM
    Cuschieri, A
    ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 29 (07) : 609 - 613
  • [3] Use of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for failed endoscopic bile duct stone extractions
    Koc, B.
    Adas, G.
    Karahan, S.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2014, 69 (04) : 209 - 215
  • [4] LAPAROSCOPIC COMMON DUCT EXPLORATION FOLLOWING FAILED ENDOSCOPIC STONE EXTRACTION
    FAULKNER, SB
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 4 (01) : 56 - 58
  • [5] Laparoscopic exploration can salvage failed endoscopic bile duct stone extraction
    Shelat, Vishal G.
    Chan, Chung Yip
    Liau, Kui Hin
    Ho, Choon Kiat
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (05) : 313 - 317
  • [6] Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration After Unsuccessful Endoscopic Stone Removal
    Paik, Kwang Yeol
    Kim, Eung Kook
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (02): : 137 - 140
  • [7] Laparoscopic management after failed endoscopic stone removal in nondilated common bile duct
    Zang Jinfeng
    Yuan Yin
    Zhang Chi
    Gao Junye
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 29 : 49 - 52
  • [8] Outcomes following common bile duct exploration versus endoscopic stone extraction before, during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with common bile duct stones
    De Silva, Harendra M.
    Howard, Tess
    Bird, David
    Hodgson, Russell
    HPB, 2022, 24 (12) : 2125 - 2133
  • [9] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure of choledochotomy after failed endoscopic sphincterotomy
    Zhou, Yong
    Wu, Xu-Dong
    Fan, Ren-Gen
    Zhou, Guang-Jun
    Mu, Xiang-Ming
    Zha, Wen-Zhang
    Jia, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 (07) : 645 - 648
  • [10] Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: a viable option for failed extraction of common bile duct stone
    Golash, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 138 - 139