Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study

被引:44
作者
Hantes, Michael E. [1 ]
Ono, Yohei [2 ]
Raoulis, Vasilios A. [1 ]
Doxariotis, Nikolaos [1 ]
Venouziou, Aaron [1 ]
Zibis, Aristidis [1 ]
Vlychou, Marianna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Larisa, Greece
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Larisa, Greece
关键词
shoulder; rotator cuff repair; single row; double row; tendon healing; arthroscopy; young population; STRUCTURAL OUTCOMES; REPAIR TECHNIQUES; INTEGRITY; METAANALYSIS; RETEAR; MINIMUM; TENDON; RATES;
D O I
10.1177/0363546517728718
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and doublerow (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid-to long-term clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya's classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [P < . 05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [P < . 05]). Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair [J].
Kim, DH ;
ElAttrachet, NS ;
Tibone, JE ;
Jun, BJ ;
DeLaMora, SN ;
Kvitnet, RS ;
Lee, TQ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (03) :407-414
[22]   Long-term Survivorship of Rotator Cuff Repairs Using Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis [J].
Kluger, Rainer ;
Bock, Peter ;
Mittlboeck, Martina ;
Krampla, Wolfgang ;
Engel, Alfred .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (10) :2071-2081
[23]   Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery [J].
Kukkonen, Juha ;
Kauko, Tommi ;
Vahlberg, Tero ;
Joukainen, Antti ;
Aarimaa, Ville .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (12) :1650-1655
[24]   Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair [J].
Mazzocca, AD ;
Millett, PJ ;
Guanche, CA ;
Santangelo, SA ;
Arciero, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (12) :1861-1868
[25]   Rotator cuff repair: The effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site [J].
Meier, Steven W. ;
Meier, Jeffrey D. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (06) :691-696
[26]   Functional and Structural Outcomes of Single-Row Versus Double-Row Versus Combined Double-Row and Suture-Bridge Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears [J].
Mihata, Teruhisa ;
Watanabe, Chisato ;
Fukunishi, Kunimoto ;
Ohue, Mutsumi ;
Tsujimura, Tomoyuki ;
Fujiwara, Kenta ;
Kinoshita, Mitsuo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (10) :2091-2098
[27]   Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials [J].
Millett, Peter J. ;
Warth, Ryan J. ;
Dornan, Grant J. ;
Lee, Jared T. ;
Spiegl, Ulrich J. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (04) :586-597
[28]   Functional Outcomes After Double-Row Versus Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair [J].
Nicholas, Stephen J. ;
Lee, Steven J. ;
Mullaney, Michael J. ;
Tyler, Timothy F. ;
Fukunaga, Takumi ;
Johnson, Christopher D. ;
McHugh, Malachy P. .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (10)
[29]   Part II: Biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique [J].
Park, Maxwell C. ;
Tibone, James E. ;
ElAttrache, Neal S. ;
Ahmad, Christopher S. ;
Jun, Bong-Jae ;
Lee, Thay Q. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (04) :469-476
[30]   Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique [J].
Park, Maxwell C. ;
ElAttrache, Neal S. ;
Tibone, James E. ;
Ahmad, Christopher S. ;
Jun, Bong-Jae ;
Lee, Thay Q. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (04) :461-468