共 41 条
Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study
被引:44
作者:
Hantes, Michael E.
[1
]
Ono, Yohei
[2
]
Raoulis, Vasilios A.
[1
]
Doxariotis, Nikolaos
[1
]
Venouziou, Aaron
[1
]
Zibis, Aristidis
[1
]
Vlychou, Marianna
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Larisa, Greece
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Larisa, Greece
关键词:
shoulder;
rotator cuff repair;
single row;
double row;
tendon healing;
arthroscopy;
young population;
STRUCTURAL OUTCOMES;
REPAIR TECHNIQUES;
INTEGRITY;
METAANALYSIS;
RETEAR;
MINIMUM;
TENDON;
RATES;
D O I:
10.1177/0363546517728718
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and doublerow (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid-to long-term clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya's classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [P < . 05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [P < . 05]). Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文