Automatic metastatic brain tumor segmentation for stereotactic radiosurgery applications

被引:25
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Stojadinovic, Strahinja [2 ]
Hrycushko, Brian [2 ]
Wardak, Zabi [2 ]
Lu, Weiguo [2 ]
Yan, Yulong [2 ]
Jiang, Steve B. [2 ]
Timmerman, Robert [2 ]
Abdulrahman, Ramzi [2 ]
Nedzi, Lucien [2 ]
Gu, Xuejun [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Coll Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
automatic segmentation; brain metastases; stereotactic radiosurgery; contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; LUNG-CANCER; MRI; IMAGES; GPU; CLASSIFICATION; CT;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/61/24/8440
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to develop an automatic segmentation strategy for efficient and accurate metastatic brain tumor delineation on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) magnetic resonance images (MRI) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications. The proposed four-step automatic brain metastases segmentation strategy is comprised of pre-processing, initial contouring, contour evolution, and contour triage. First, T1c brain images are preprocessed to remove the skull. Second, an initial tumor contour is created using a multi-scaled adaptive threshold-based bounding box and a super-voxel clustering technique. Third, the initial contours are evolved to the tumor boundary using a regional active contour technique. Fourth, all detected false-positive contours are removed with geometric characterization. The segmentation process was validated on a realistic virtual phantom containing Gaussian or Rician noise. For each type of noise distribution, five different noise levels were tested. Twenty-one cases from the multimodal brain tumor image segmentation (BRATS) challenge dataset and fifteen clinical metastases cases were also included in validation. Segmentation performance was quantified by the Dice coefficient (DC), normalized mutual information (NMI), structural similarity (SSIM), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean value of surface-to-surface distance (MSSD) and standard deviation of surface-to-surface distance (SDSSD). In the numerical phantom study, the evaluation yielded a DC of 0.98 +/- 0.01, an NMI of 0.97 +/- 0.01, an SSIM of 0.999 +/- 0.001, an HD of 2.2 +/- 0.8 mm, an MSSD of 0.1 +/- 0.1 mm, and an SDSSD of 0.3 +/- 0.1 mm. The validation on the BRATS data resulted in a DC of 0.89 +/- 0.08, which outperform the BRATS challenge algorithms. Evaluation on clinical datasets gave a DC of 0.86 +/- 0.09, an NMI of 0.80 +/- 0.11, an SSIM of 0.999 +/- 0.001, an HD of 8.8 +/- 12.6 mm, an MSSD of 1.5 +/- 3.2 mm, and an SDSSD of 1.8 +/- 3.4 mm when comparing to the physician drawn ground truth. The result indicated that the developed automatic segmentation strategy yielded accurate brain tumor delineation and presented as a useful clinical tool for SRS applications.
引用
收藏
页码:8440 / 8461
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases
    Giuseppe Minniti
    Rolando M. D’Angelillo
    Claudia Scaringi
    Luca E. Trodella
    Enrico Clarke
    Paolo Matteucci
    Mattia Falchetto Osti
    Sara Ramella
    Riccardo Maurizi Enrici
    Lucio Trodella
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2014, 117 : 295 - 301
  • [32] Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases
    Minniti, Giuseppe
    D'Angelillo, Rolando M.
    Scaringi, Claudia
    Trodella, Luca E.
    Clarke, Enrico
    Matteucci, Paolo
    Osti, Mattia Falchetto
    Ramella, Sara
    Enrici, Riccardo Maurizi
    Trodella, Lucio
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 117 (02) : 295 - 301
  • [33] Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Brain Metastases
    Lehrer, Eric J.
    Breen, William G.
    Singh, Raj
    Palmer, Joshua D.
    Brown, Paul D.
    Trifiletti, Daniel M.
    Sheehan, Jason P.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 95 (02) : 253 - 258
  • [34] Stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: a retrospective study
    Gruber, Isabella
    Weidner, Karin
    Treutwein, Marius
    Koelbl, Oliver
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [35] Role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases
    Hazard, LJ
    Jensen, RL
    Shrieve, DC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (04): : 403 - 410
  • [36] Stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: a retrospective study
    Isabella Gruber
    Karin Weidner
    Marius Treutwein
    Oliver Koelbl
    Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [37] Tumor bed radiosurgery following resection and prior stereotactic radiosurgery for locally persistent brain metastasis
    Holt, Douglas Emerson
    Gill, Beant Singh
    Clump, David Anthony
    Leeman, Jonathan E.
    Burton, Steven A.
    Amankulor, Nduka M.
    Engh, Johnathan Anderson
    Heron, Dwight E.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5
  • [38] A review of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases
    Sperduto, PW
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2003, 2 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [39] Primary or salvage stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastatic small cell lung cancer
    Faramand, Andrew
    Niranjan, Ajay
    Kano, Hideyuki
    Flickinger, John
    Lunsford, L. Dade
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 144 (01) : 217 - 225
  • [40] Primary or salvage stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastatic small cell lung cancer
    Andrew Faramand
    Ajay Niranjan
    Hideyuki Kano
    John Flickinger
    L. Dade Lunsford
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2019, 144 : 217 - 225