Automatic metastatic brain tumor segmentation for stereotactic radiosurgery applications

被引:25
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Stojadinovic, Strahinja [2 ]
Hrycushko, Brian [2 ]
Wardak, Zabi [2 ]
Lu, Weiguo [2 ]
Yan, Yulong [2 ]
Jiang, Steve B. [2 ]
Timmerman, Robert [2 ]
Abdulrahman, Ramzi [2 ]
Nedzi, Lucien [2 ]
Gu, Xuejun [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Coll Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
automatic segmentation; brain metastases; stereotactic radiosurgery; contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; LUNG-CANCER; MRI; IMAGES; GPU; CLASSIFICATION; CT;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/61/24/8440
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to develop an automatic segmentation strategy for efficient and accurate metastatic brain tumor delineation on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) magnetic resonance images (MRI) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications. The proposed four-step automatic brain metastases segmentation strategy is comprised of pre-processing, initial contouring, contour evolution, and contour triage. First, T1c brain images are preprocessed to remove the skull. Second, an initial tumor contour is created using a multi-scaled adaptive threshold-based bounding box and a super-voxel clustering technique. Third, the initial contours are evolved to the tumor boundary using a regional active contour technique. Fourth, all detected false-positive contours are removed with geometric characterization. The segmentation process was validated on a realistic virtual phantom containing Gaussian or Rician noise. For each type of noise distribution, five different noise levels were tested. Twenty-one cases from the multimodal brain tumor image segmentation (BRATS) challenge dataset and fifteen clinical metastases cases were also included in validation. Segmentation performance was quantified by the Dice coefficient (DC), normalized mutual information (NMI), structural similarity (SSIM), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean value of surface-to-surface distance (MSSD) and standard deviation of surface-to-surface distance (SDSSD). In the numerical phantom study, the evaluation yielded a DC of 0.98 +/- 0.01, an NMI of 0.97 +/- 0.01, an SSIM of 0.999 +/- 0.001, an HD of 2.2 +/- 0.8 mm, an MSSD of 0.1 +/- 0.1 mm, and an SDSSD of 0.3 +/- 0.1 mm. The validation on the BRATS data resulted in a DC of 0.89 +/- 0.08, which outperform the BRATS challenge algorithms. Evaluation on clinical datasets gave a DC of 0.86 +/- 0.09, an NMI of 0.80 +/- 0.11, an SSIM of 0.999 +/- 0.001, an HD of 8.8 +/- 12.6 mm, an MSSD of 1.5 +/- 3.2 mm, and an SDSSD of 1.8 +/- 3.4 mm when comparing to the physician drawn ground truth. The result indicated that the developed automatic segmentation strategy yielded accurate brain tumor delineation and presented as a useful clinical tool for SRS applications.
引用
收藏
页码:8440 / 8461
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Radiosurgery: Prospective Clinical Evaluation
    Shirokikh, Boris
    Dalechina, Alexandra
    Shevtsov, Alexey
    Krivov, Egor
    Kostjuchenko, Valery
    Durgaryan, Amayak
    Galkin, Mikhail
    Osinov, Ivan
    Golanov, Andrey
    Belyaev, Mikhail
    BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES (BRAINLES 2019), PT I, 2020, 11992 : 119 - 128
  • [22] Extent of perilesional edema differentiates radionecrosis from tumor recurrence following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases
    Leeman, Jonathan E.
    Clump, David A.
    Flickinger, John C.
    Mintz, Arlan H.
    Burton, Steven A.
    Heron, Dwight E.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 15 (12) : 1732 - 1738
  • [23] Salvage whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery after initial stereotactic radiosurgery for 1–4 brain metastases
    Yufei Liu
    Brian M. Alexander
    Yu-Hui Chen
    Margaret C. Horvath
    Ayal A. Aizer
    Elizabeth B. Claus
    Ian F. Dunn
    Alexandra J. Golby
    Mark D. Johnson
    Scott Friesen
    Edward G. Mannarino
    Matthew Wagar
    Fred L. Hacker
    Nils D. Arvold
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2015, 124 : 429 - 437
  • [24] The impact of target positioning error and tumor size on radiobiological parameters in robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors
    Takeshi Takizawa
    Satoshi Tanabe
    Hisashi Nakano
    Satoru Utsunomiya
    Madoka Sakai
    Katsuya Maruyama
    Shigekazu Takeuchi
    Toshimichi Nakano
    Atsushi Ohta
    Motoki Kaidu
    Hiroyuki Ishikawa
    Kiyoshi Onda
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2022, 15 : 135 - 146
  • [25] Radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors
    Serizawa, Toru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 14 (04) : 289 - 298
  • [26] Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: Background, definitions, applications
    Shoshan, Y
    Wygoda, M
    Umansky, F
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 7 (09): : 597 - 599
  • [27] Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Radiosurgery: a Further Evolution in the Management of Brain Metastases
    Udovicich, Cristian
    Phillips, Claire
    Kok, David L.
    Tange, Damien
    Plumridge, Nikki M.
    Prabhu, Roshan S.
    Haghighi, Neda
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 21 (08)
  • [28] Outcome of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic to The Brain
    Mariya, Yasushi
    Sekizawa, Genichirou
    Matsuoka, Yoshisuke
    Seki, Hirobumi
    Sugawara, Takayuki
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2010, 51 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [29] Tumor control and incidence of radiation necrosis after reirradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases
    Terakedis, Breanne E.
    Jensen, Randy L.
    Boucher, Kenneth
    Shrieve, Dennis C.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT, 2014, 3 (01): : 21 - 28
  • [30] Salvage whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery after initial stereotactic radiosurgery for 1-4 brain metastases
    Liu, Yufei
    Alexander, Brian M.
    Chen, Yu-Hui
    Horvath, Margaret C.
    Aizer, Ayal A.
    Claus, Elizabeth B.
    Dunn, Ian F.
    Golby, Alexandra J.
    Johnson, Mark D.
    Friesen, Scott
    Mannarino, Edward G.
    Wagar, Matthew
    Hacker, Fred L.
    Arvold, Nils D.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 124 (03) : 429 - 437