Automatic metastatic brain tumor segmentation for stereotactic radiosurgery applications

被引:25
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Stojadinovic, Strahinja [2 ]
Hrycushko, Brian [2 ]
Wardak, Zabi [2 ]
Lu, Weiguo [2 ]
Yan, Yulong [2 ]
Jiang, Steve B. [2 ]
Timmerman, Robert [2 ]
Abdulrahman, Ramzi [2 ]
Nedzi, Lucien [2 ]
Gu, Xuejun [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Coll Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
automatic segmentation; brain metastases; stereotactic radiosurgery; contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; LUNG-CANCER; MRI; IMAGES; GPU; CLASSIFICATION; CT;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/61/24/8440
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to develop an automatic segmentation strategy for efficient and accurate metastatic brain tumor delineation on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) magnetic resonance images (MRI) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications. The proposed four-step automatic brain metastases segmentation strategy is comprised of pre-processing, initial contouring, contour evolution, and contour triage. First, T1c brain images are preprocessed to remove the skull. Second, an initial tumor contour is created using a multi-scaled adaptive threshold-based bounding box and a super-voxel clustering technique. Third, the initial contours are evolved to the tumor boundary using a regional active contour technique. Fourth, all detected false-positive contours are removed with geometric characterization. The segmentation process was validated on a realistic virtual phantom containing Gaussian or Rician noise. For each type of noise distribution, five different noise levels were tested. Twenty-one cases from the multimodal brain tumor image segmentation (BRATS) challenge dataset and fifteen clinical metastases cases were also included in validation. Segmentation performance was quantified by the Dice coefficient (DC), normalized mutual information (NMI), structural similarity (SSIM), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean value of surface-to-surface distance (MSSD) and standard deviation of surface-to-surface distance (SDSSD). In the numerical phantom study, the evaluation yielded a DC of 0.98 +/- 0.01, an NMI of 0.97 +/- 0.01, an SSIM of 0.999 +/- 0.001, an HD of 2.2 +/- 0.8 mm, an MSSD of 0.1 +/- 0.1 mm, and an SDSSD of 0.3 +/- 0.1 mm. The validation on the BRATS data resulted in a DC of 0.89 +/- 0.08, which outperform the BRATS challenge algorithms. Evaluation on clinical datasets gave a DC of 0.86 +/- 0.09, an NMI of 0.80 +/- 0.11, an SSIM of 0.999 +/- 0.001, an HD of 8.8 +/- 12.6 mm, an MSSD of 1.5 +/- 3.2 mm, and an SDSSD of 1.8 +/- 3.4 mm when comparing to the physician drawn ground truth. The result indicated that the developed automatic segmentation strategy yielded accurate brain tumor delineation and presented as a useful clinical tool for SRS applications.
引用
收藏
页码:8440 / 8461
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Metastatic Brain Tumor
    Kim, Young Goo
    EWHA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 44 (04): : 103 - 110
  • [2] Stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors
    Chamberlain, MC
    Kormanik, P
    Barba, D
    Fuller, BG
    Smith, DE
    Shea, WMC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 1996, 8 (03) : 617 - 624
  • [3] Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of metastatic disease to the brain
    Chen, JCT
    O'Day, S
    Morton, D
    Essner, R
    Cohen-Gadol, A
    MacPherson, D
    Giannotta, SL
    Petrovich, Z
    Yu, C
    Apuzzo, MLJ
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 73 (1-4) : 60 - 63
  • [4] Predictors of tumor control in patients treated with linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic disease to the brain
    Schomas, DA
    Roeske, JC
    MacDonald, RL
    Sweeney, PJ
    Mehta, N
    Mundt, AJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (02): : 180 - 187
  • [5] Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases
    Lam, Tai-Chung
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Chang, Eric L.
    Lo, Simon S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (10) : 1153 - 1172
  • [6] Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Brain Tumors
    Elaimy, Ameer L.
    Mackay, Alexander R.
    Lamoreaux, Wayne T.
    Fairbanks, Robert K.
    Demakas, John J.
    Cooke, Barton S.
    Lee, Christopher M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 75 (5-6) : 673 - 683
  • [7] Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurred Metastatic Brain Tumors
    Kim, In-Young
    Jung, Shin
    Jung, Tae-Young
    Moon, Kyung-Sub
    Jang, Woo-Youl
    Park, Jae-Young
    Song, Tae-Wook
    Lim, Sa-Hoe
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 61 (05) : 633 - 639
  • [8] Radiosurgery for cystic metastatic brain tumor
    Uchino, M
    Nagao, T
    Seiki, Y
    Shibata, I
    Terao, H
    Kaneko, I
    NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2000, 28 (05): : 417 - 421
  • [9] The impact of target positioning error and tumor size on radiobiological parameters in robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors
    Takizawa, Takeshi
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Nakano, Hisashi
    Utsunomiya, Satoru
    Sakai, Madoka
    Maruyama, Katsuya
    Takeuchi, Shigekazu
    Nakano, Toshimichi
    Ohta, Atsushi
    Kaidu, Motoki
    Ishikawa, Hiroyuki
    Onda, Kiyoshi
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 15 (02) : 135 - 146
  • [10] A web-based brain metastases segmentation and labeling platform for stereotactic radiosurgery
    Yang, Zi
    Liu, Hui
    Liu, Yan
    Stojadinovic, Strahinja
    Timmerman, Robert
    Nedzi, Lucien
    Dan, Tu
    Wardak, Zabi
    Lu, Weiguo
    Gu, Xuejun
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (08) : 3263 - 3276