Machine Learning-Based Modeling of Ovarian Response and the Quantitative Evaluation of Comprehensive Impact Features

被引:9
作者
Liu, Liu [1 ]
Shen, Fujin [1 ]
Liang, Hua [1 ]
Yang, Zhe [2 ]
Yang, Jing [2 ]
Chen, Jiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Reprod Med Ctr, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
machine learning; controlled ovarian stimulation; number of oocytes retrieved; dosage of Gn; clinical decision support; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT; EMBRYO QUALITY; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY; HORMONE; RESERVE; INTELLIGENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12020492
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Appropriate ovarian responses to the controlled ovarian stimulation strategy is the premise for a good outcome of the in vitro fertilization cycle. With the booming of artificial intelligence, machine learning is becoming a popular and promising approach for tailoring a controlled ovarian stimulation strategy. Nowadays, most machine learning-based tailoring strategies aim to generally classify the controlled ovarian stimulation outcome, lacking the capacity to precisely predict the outcome and evaluate the impact features. Based on a clinical cohort composed of 1365 women and two machine learning methods of artificial neural network and supporting vector regression, a regression prediction model of the number of oocytes retrieved is trained, validated, and selected. Given the proposed model, an index called the normalized mean impact value is defined and calculated to reflect the importance of each impact feature. The proposed models can estimate the number of oocytes retrieved with high precision, with the regression coefficient being 0.882% and 89.84% of the instances having the prediction number <= 5. Among the impact features, the antral follicle count has the highest importance, followed by the E-2 level on the human chorionic gonadotropin day, the age, and the Anti-Mullerian hormone, with their normalized mean impact value > 0.3. Based on the proposed model, the prognostic results for ovarian response can be predicted, which enables scientific clinical decision support for the customized controlled ovarian stimulation strategies for women, and eventually helps yield better in vitro fertilization outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Trending in human ARTs: Jumping on the Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning bandwagon
    Albertini, David F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (07) : 1605 - 1606
  • [2] Antral follicle count (AFC) can be used in the prediction of ovarian response but cannot predict the oocyte/embryo quality or the in vitro fertilization outcome in an egg donation program
    Barreto Melo, Marco Antonio
    Garrido, Nicolas
    Alvarez, Claudio
    Bellver, Jose
    Meseguer, Marcos
    Pellicer, Antonio
    Remohi, Jose
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (01) : 148 - 156
  • [3] Diminished ovarian reserve as measured by means of baseline follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count is not associated with pregnancy loss in younger in vitro fertilization patients
    Bishop, Lauren A.
    Richter, Kevin S.
    Patounakis, George
    Andriani, Leslie
    Moon, Kimberly
    Devine, Kate
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (06) : 980 - 987
  • [4] Serum estradiol positively predicts outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization
    Blazar, AS
    Hogan, JW
    Frankfurter, D
    Hackett, R
    Keefe, DL
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (06) : 1707 - 1709
  • [5] A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome
    Broekmans, F. J.
    Kwee, J.
    Hendriks, D. J.
    Mol, B. W.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2006, 12 (06) : 685 - 718
  • [6] The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count
    Broer, Simtone L.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Hendriks, Dave
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (03) : 705 - 714
  • [7] Are we choosing the correct FSH starting dose during controlled ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination cycles? Potential application of a nomogram based on woman's age and markers of ovarian reserve
    Di Paola, Rossana
    Garzon, Simone
    Giuliani, Sara
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Noventa, Marco
    Parissone, Francesca
    Zorzi, Carlotta
    Raffaelli, Ricciarda
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Franchi, Massimo
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (05) : 1029 - 1035
  • [8] High ovarian response does not jeopardize ongoing pregnancy rates and increases cumulative pregnancy rates in a GnRH-antagonist protocol
    Fatemi, Human M.
    Doody, Kevin
    Griesinger, Georg
    Witjes, Han
    Mannaerts, Bernadette
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (02) : 442 - 452
  • [9] Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation
    Fauser, B. C. J. M.
    Diedrich, K.
    Devroey, P.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2008, 14 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [10] Artificial intelligence in the IVF laboratory: overview through the application of different types of algorithms for the classification of reproductive data
    Fernandez, Eleonora Inacio
    Ferreira, Andre Satoshi
    Cecilio, Matheus Henrique Miquelao
    Cheles, Doris Spinosa
    de Souza, Rebeca Colauto Milanezi
    Nogueira, Marcelo Fabio Gouveia
    Rocha, Jose Celso
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2020, 37 (10) : 2359 - 2376