How implicit theories help differentiate approaches to online impression management: A preliminary typology

被引:15
作者
Berkelaar, Brenda L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Moody Coll Commun, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
cybervetting; implicit theories; impression management; information management; information visibility; lay theories; mindset; online screening; social media; ORGANIZATION; MEDIA; WORK;
D O I
10.1177/1461444816654136
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article proposes an empirically-grounded typology to describe how people approach online impression management across multiple digital sites given employers' use of online information for personnel selection. Qualitative analysis revealed four primary online impression management types: acceptor, dissident, scrubber, and strategist. The four types are primarily differentiated based on people's relatively fixed or relatively flexible implicit theories about information, technology, visibility, and identity, and whether people take passive, reactive, or active approaches to online impression management. Although research on implicit theories usually focuses on individual attributes, these findings highlight how people's implicit theories about the context or field of communicative action work in combination to influence impression management behavior. This study suggests practical interventions to increase people's agency and effectiveness in managing online information and provides foundations for future research on online impression, information management, and implicit theories.
引用
收藏
页码:2039 / 2058
页数:20
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Annals of the International Communication Association, DOI [DOI 10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130, 10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130]
[2]  
Benoit W.L., 1995, Accounts, excuses, and apologies
[3]  
Berkelaar BL, 2015, J APPL COMMUNICATION, V42, P456
[4]   Cybervetting, Online Information, and Personnel Selection: New Transparency Expectations and the Emergence of a Digital Social Contract [J].
Berkelaar, Brenda L. .
MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2014, 28 (04) :479-506
[5]  
Bureau of Labor and Statistics, 2015, CIV LAB FORC DET AG
[6]  
CareerBuilder, 2013, CAND BEH STUD
[7]  
Case DonaldOwen., 2012, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior
[8]   EDITORS' COMMENTS: STYLES OF THEORIZING AND THE SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE [J].
Delbridge, Rick ;
Fiss, Peer C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (03) :325-331
[9]  
Dweck C.S., 2012, HDB THEORIES SOCIAL, V2, P43, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781446249222, DOI 10.4135/9781446249222.N28]
[10]  
Ellison N, 2006, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V11