A note on the blind deconvolution of multiple sparse signals from unknown subspaces

被引:7
|
作者
Cosse, Augustin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Courant Inst Math Sci, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] NYU, Ctr Data Sci, NYC, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Ecole Normale Super, Dept Math & Applicat, Paris, France
来源
WAVELETS AND SPARSITY XVII | 2017年 / 10394卷
关键词
Blind deconvolution; l(1)-minimization; Compressed sensing; Convex programming; Schur complement; ESPIRIT;
D O I
10.1117/12.2272836
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
This note studies the recovery of multiple sparse signals, x(n) is an element of R-L, n = 1, . . .N, from the knowledge of their convolution with an unknown point spread function h is an element of R-L. When the point spread function is known to be nonzero, vertical bar h[k]vertical bar > 0, this blind deconvolution problem can be relaxed into a linear, ill-posed inverse problem in the vector concatenating the unknown inputs x(n) together with the inverse of the filter, d is an element of R-L where d[k] = 1/h [k]. When prior information is given on the input subspaces, the resulting overdetermined linear system can be solved efficiently via least squares ( see Ling et al. 2016(1)). When no information is given on those subspaces, and the inputs are only known to be sparse, it still remains possible to recover these inputs along with the filter by considering an additional l(1) penalty. This note certifies exact recovery of both the unknown PSF and unknown sparse inputs, from the knowledge of their convolutions, as soon as the number of inputs N and the dimension of each input, L, satisfy L greater than or similar to N and N greater than or similar to T-max(2), up to log factors. Here T-max = max(n){T} and T-n, n = 1, . . . , N denote the supports of the inputs x(n). Our proof system combines the recent results on blind deconvolution via least squares to certify invertibility of the linear map encoding the convolutions, with the construction of a dual certificate following the structure first suggested in Candes et al. 2007.(2) Unlike in these papers, however, it is not possible to rely on the norm parallel to(A*(T)A(T))(-1)parallel to to certify recovery. We instead use a combination of the Schur Complement and Neumann series to compute an expression for the inverse (A*(T)A(T))(-1). Given this expression, it is possible to show that the poorly scaled blocks in (A*(T)A(T))(-1) are multiplied by the better scaled ones or vanish in the construction of the certificate. Recovery is certified with high probablility on the choice of the supports and distribution of the signs of each input x(n) on the support. The paper follows the line of previous work by Wang et al. 2016(3) where the authors guarantee recovery for subgaussian x Bernoulli inputs satisfying Ex(n) [k] is an element of [1/10,1] as soon as N greater than or similar to L. Examples of applications include seismic imaging with unknown source or marine seismic data deghosting, magnetic resonance autocalibration or multiple channel estimation in communication. Numerical experiments are provided along with a discussion on the sample complexity tightness.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blind Deconvolution From Multiple Sparse Inputs
    Wang, Liming
    Chi, Yuejie
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2016, 23 (10) : 1384 - 1388
  • [2] On The Impossibility of Blind Deconvolution for Geometrically Decaying Subspace Sparse Signals
    Choudhary, Sunav
    Mitra, Urbashi
    2014 IEEE GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (GLOBALSIP), 2014, : 463 - 467
  • [3] Surface-Consistent Sparse Multichannel Blind Deconvolution of Seismic Signals
    Kazemi, Nasser
    Bongajum, Emmanuel
    Sacchi, Mauricio D.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (06): : 3200 - 3207
  • [4] Blind Recovery of Sparse Signals From Subsampled Convolution
    Lee, Kiryung
    Li, Yanjun
    Junge, Marius
    Bresler, Yoram
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2017, 63 (02) : 802 - 821
  • [5] Blind deconvolution for sparse molecular imaging
    Herrity, Kyle
    Raich, Raviv
    Hero, Alfred O., III
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 545 - +
  • [6] Bussgang blind deconvolution for impulsive signals
    Mathis, H
    Douglas, SC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2003, 51 (07) : 1905 - 1915
  • [7] RADAR AUTOFOCUS USING SPARSE BLIND DECONVOLUTION
    Mansour, Hassan
    Liu, Dehong
    Boufounos, Petros T.
    Kamilov, Ulugbek S.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2018, : 1623 - 1627
  • [8] Structured Local Optima in Sparse Blind Deconvolution
    Zhang, Yuqian
    Kuo, Han-Wen
    Wright, John
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2020, 66 (01) : 419 - 452
  • [9] Sparse Blind Deconvolution: What Cannot Be Done
    Choudhary, Sunav
    Mitra, Urbashi
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY (ISIT), 2014, : 3002 - 3006
  • [10] ON lP-NORM SPARSE BLIND DECONVOLUTION
    Nose-Filho, Kenji
    Romano, Joao M. T.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MACHINE LEARNING FOR SIGNAL PROCESSING (MLSP), 2014,