Tobacco industry sociological programs to influence public beliefs about smoking

被引:35
作者
Landman, Anne [1 ]
Cortese, Daniel K. [1 ]
Glantz, Stanton [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Tobacco Control Res Educ, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
secondhand smoke; addiction; nicotine; public relations; special projects; public health; tobacco industry;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The multinational tobacco companies responded to arguments about the social costs of smoking and hazards of secondhand smoke by quietly implementing the Social Costs/Social Values project (1979-1989), which relied upon the knowledge and authoritative power of social scientists to construct an alternate cultural repertoire of smoking. Social scientists created and disseminated non-health based, pro-tobacco arguments without fully acknowledging their relationship with the industry. After the US Surgeon General concluded that nicotine was addictive in 1988, the industry responded by forming "Associates for Research in the Science of Enjoyment" (c. 1988-1999), whose members toured the world promoting the health benefits of the use of legal substances, including tobacco, for stress relief and relaxation, without acknowledging the industry's role. In this paper we draw on previously secret tobacco industry documents, now available on the Internet to show how both of these programs utilized academic sociologists, political scientists, anthropologists, psychologists, philosophers and economists, and allowed the industry to develop and widely disseminate friendly research through credible channels. Strategies included creating favorable surveys and opinions, infusing them into the lay press and media through press releases, articles and conferences, publishing, promoting and disseminating books, commissioning and placing favorable book reviews, providing media training for book authors and organizing media tours. These programs allowed the tobacco industry to affect public and academic discourse on the social acceptability of smoking. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 981
页数:12
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
ANDERSON SJ, 2006, J I ECON, V2, P273
[2]  
*ARISE, 1996, INT COMM PROGR 1994
[3]  
*ARISE, 1994, ARISE ASS RES SCI EN
[4]  
*ARISE, 1993, ARISE ASS RES SUBST
[5]  
*ARISE, 1996, INF CONT
[6]  
*ARISE, 1994, ASS RES SCI ENJ
[7]  
*ARISE, 1993, ASS RES SCI ENJ
[8]   Care and feeding: the Asian environmental tobacco smoke consultants programme [J].
Assunta, M ;
Fields, N ;
Knight, J ;
Chapman, S .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2004, 13 :4-12
[9]  
BARNES D, 2001, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V279, P1566
[10]   Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: An analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research [J].
Barnes, DE ;
Bero, LA .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 1996, 21 (03) :515-542