Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial

被引:64
作者
de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R. [1 ,2 ]
de Haan, Margriet C. [2 ]
Stoop, Esther M. [3 ]
Bossuyt, Patrick M. [4 ]
Thomeer, Maarten [5 ]
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise [6 ]
van Leerdam, Monique E. [3 ]
Fockens, Paul [1 ]
Kuipers, Ernst J. [3 ,7 ]
Stoker, Jaap [2 ]
Dekker, Evelien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; BOWEL PREPARATION; CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY; PATIENT PREFERENCES; FOLLOW-UP; POPULATION; QUALITY; POLYPECTOMY; ACCEPTANCE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301308
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective CT-colonography has been suggested to be less burdensome for primary colorectal cancer (CRC) screening than colonoscopy. To compare the expected and perceived burden of both in a randomised trial. Design 8844 Dutch citizens aged 50-74 years were randomly invited for CRC screening with colonoscopy (n=5924) or CT-colonography (n=2920). Colonoscopy was performed after full colon lavage, or CT-colonography after limited bowel preparation (noncathartic). All invitees were asked to complete the expected burden questionnaire before the procedure. All participants were invited to complete the perceived burden questionnaire 14 days later. Mean scores were calculated on 5-point scales. Results Expected burden: 2111 (36%) colonoscopy and 1199 (41%) CT-colonography invitees completed the expected burden questionnaire. Colonoscopy invitees expected the bowel preparation and screening procedure to be more burdensome than CT-colonography invitees: mean scores 3.0 +/- 1.1 vs 2.3 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001) and 3.1 +/- 1.1 vs 2.2 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001). Perceived burden: 1009/1276 (79%) colonoscopy and 801/982 (82%) CT-colonography participants completed the perceived burden questionnaire. The full screening procedure was reported as more burdensome in CT-colonography than in colonoscopy: 1.8 +/- 0.9 vs 2.0 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001). Drinking the bowel preparation resulted in a higher burden score in colonoscopy (3.0 +/- 1.3 vs 1.7 +/- 1.0, p < 0.001) while related bowel movements were scored more burdensome in CT-colonography (2.0 +/- 1.0 vs 2.2 +/- 1.1, p < 0.001). Most participants would probably or definitely take part in a next screening round: 96% for colonoscopy and 93% for CT-colonography (p=0.99). Conclusion In a CRC screening programme, colonoscopy invitees expected the screening procedure and bowel preparation to be more burdensome than CTcolonography invitees. In participants, CT-colonography was scored as more burdensome than colonoscopy. Intended participation in a next screening round was comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:1552 / 1559
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy S. ;
Edwards, Rob ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Hart, Andrew R. ;
Northover, John M. A. ;
Parkin, D. Max ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) :1624-1633
[2]   NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy [J].
Bretthauer, M ;
Thiis-Evensen, E ;
Huppertz-Hauss, G ;
Gisselsson, L ;
Grotmol, T ;
Skovlund, E ;
Hoff, G .
GUT, 2002, 50 (05) :604-607
[3]   CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing [J].
Buccicardi, Duccio ;
Grosso, Massimo ;
Caviglia, Ilaria ;
Gastaldo, Alessandro ;
Carbone, Sabrina ;
Neri, Emanuele ;
Bartolozzi, Carlo ;
Quadri, Piergiorgio .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2011, 36 (05) :532-537
[4]   CT colonography standards [J].
Burling, D. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 65 (06) :474-480
[5]   Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis [J].
de Haan, Margriet C. ;
van Gelder, Rogier E. ;
Graser, Anno ;
Bipat, Shandra ;
Stoker, Jaap .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (08) :1747-1763
[6]   Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial [J].
de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R. ;
de Haan, Margriet C. ;
Stoop, Esther M. ;
Deutekom, Marije ;
Fockens, Paul ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. ;
Thomeer, Maarten ;
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ;
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise ;
van Leerdam, Monique E. ;
Kuipers, Ernst J. ;
Dekker, Evelien ;
Stoker, Jaap .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 10
[7]   Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated fecal occult blood test in the Netherlands [J].
Denters, Maaike J. ;
Deutekom, Marije ;
Fockens, Paul ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. ;
Dekker, Evelien .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 9
[8]   Patients' perception of tests in the assessment of faecal incontinence [J].
Deutekom, M ;
Terra, MP ;
Dijkgraaf, MGW ;
Dobben, AC ;
Stoker, J ;
Boeckxstaens, GE ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 79 (938) :94-100
[9]   Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006 [J].
Ferlay, J. ;
Autier, P. ;
Boniol, M. ;
Heanue, M. ;
Colombet, M. ;
Boyle, P. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (03) :581-592
[10]   A comparison of colorectal neoplasia screening tests: a multicentre community-based study of the impact of consumer choice [J].
Forbes, Geoffrey M. ;
Mendelson, Richard M. ;
Edwards, John T. ;
Foster, Noellene M. ;
Pawlik, Janina Z. ;
Bampton, Peter A. ;
Voyvodic, Frank ;
Upton, Jane ;
Macrae, Finlay A. ;
Stella, Damien ;
Viney, Bernadette ;
Pizzey, Cathy J. ;
Fritschi, Lin ;
Heyworth, Jane .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 184 (11) :546-550