Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade

被引:24
作者
Kieffer, Michael J. [1 ]
Lesaux, Nonie K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, Appl Linguist Program, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Vocabulary; Morphological awareness; English-as-a-second-language; Language minority; Bilingualism; Context clues; ENGLISH-LANGUAGE LEARNERS; READING-COMPREHENSION; MORPHOLOGICAL AWARENESS; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; MINORITY LEARNERS; INSTRUCTION; ABILITY; PROFICIENCY; LITERACY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s11145-010-9272-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite acknowledging the complex nature of vocabulary knowledge, researchers have rarely investigated the dimensionality of this construct empirically. This study was designed to test a multi-dimensional model of English vocabulary knowledge for sixth-grade students from linguistically diverse backgrounds (n = 584). Participants included language minority students learning English as a second language (L2) and students who learned English as a first language (L1). Students were assessed on 13 reading-based measures tapping various aspects of vocabulary knowledge. Using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis, we found that vocabulary was comprised of three highly related, but distinct dimensions-breadth, contextual sensitivity, and morphological awareness. This three-dimensional model was found to hold for L2 learners as well as L1 speakers. Although the L2 learners were statistically significantly lower than the L1 students on all three dimensions, the magnitude of the difference for morphological awareness (d = .37) was somewhat smaller than that for vocabulary breadth (d = .52) and contextual sensitivity (d = .49). Results were similar for a subsample of Spanish-speaking L2 learners and for the full sample of L2 learners from various home language groups. Findings support a distinction between word-specific and word-general knowledge in understanding individual and group differences in vocabulary.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 373
页数:27
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]  
Anderson R.C., 1981, COMPREHENSION TEACHI, P77, DOI DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2012.31007
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB BILINGUALISM PSY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, READING SECONDARY CO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Teaching children to read: An evidence based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, TIM ACT AG ADV AD LI
[7]  
August D., 2005, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, V20, P50, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1540-5826.2005.00120.X
[8]   Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth-grade students' ability to derive and infer word meanings [J].
Baumann, JF ;
Edwards, EC ;
Boland, EM ;
Olejnik, S ;
Kame'enui, EJ .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2003, 40 (02) :447-494
[9]   Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students [J].
Baumann, JF ;
Edwards, EC ;
Font, G ;
Tereshinski, CA ;
Kame'enui, EJ ;
Olejnik, S .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2002, 37 (02) :150-176
[10]   VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT - ALL CONTEXTS ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL [J].
BECK, IL ;
MCKEOWN, MG ;
MCCASLIN, ES .
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 1983, 83 (03) :177-181