Reduced tillage, mulching and rotational effects on maize (Zea mays L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Walp) L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. (Moench)) yields under semi-arid conditions

被引:94
作者
Mupangwa, W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Twomlow, S. [1 ]
Walker, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, Matopos Res Stn, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
[2] Univ Free State, Dept Soil Crop & Climate Sci, ZA-9300 Bloemfontein, South Africa
[3] CIMMYT, So Africa Reg Off, Harare, Zimbabwe
关键词
Cowpea; Crop rotation; Maize; Planting basins; Sorghum; SOIL-WATER REGIMES; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; RESIDUAL BENEFITS; GRAIN LEGUMES; N-2; FIXATION; GROWTH; PRODUCTIVITY; CROP; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.020
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Proponents of conservation agriculture (CA) argue that the CA approach offers the greatest opportunity to increase the productivity in smallholder agro-ecosystems. This study was designed to assess (1) first year maize, cowpea and sorghum yield responses to a combination of reduced tillage and mulching and (2) maize yield responses to rotation with cowpea and sorghum in reduced tillage systems. Two conservation tillage methods (ripping and planting basins) combined factorially with seven mulch levels (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 10 t ha(-1)) were compared with conventional mouldboard ploughing. The experiment was run for four consecutive growing seasons allowing for a rotation of maize. cowpea, sorghum and maize in some fields used in the study. Crop yields were determined across all tillage and mulch combinations in each year. Tillage system had no significant effect on maize yield while maize grain yield increased with increase in mulch cover in seasons that had below average rainfall. Mulching at 2-4 t ha(-1) gave optimum yields in seasons with below average rainfall. Tillage system and mulching had no significant effect on cowpea yield when soil moisture was not limiting. However, the ripper and basin systems had 142 and 102% more cowpea grain than the conventional system in 2006/2007 because of differences in planting dates used in three systems and poor rainfall distribution. The conventional and ripper systems gave 26 and 38% more sorghum grain than the basin system. Rotating maize with cowpea and sorghum resulted in 114, 123 and 9% more grain than first year maize, maize-maize monocrop and maize-cowpea-maize in the conventional system. In the ripper system, maize-cowpea-sorghum-maize rotation gave 98. 153 and 39% more grain than first year maize, maize-maize monocrop and maize-cowpea-maize rotation. In the basin system, maize-cowpea-sorghum-maize rotation gave 274. 240 and 43% more grain than first year maize, maize-maize monocrop and maize-cowpea-maize rotation. However, long term studies under different soil, climatic and socio-economic conditions still need to be conducted to substantiate the observations made in the reported study. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 148
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Farmers' agronomic and social evaluation of productivity, yield and N2-fixation in different cowpea varieties and their subsequent residual N effects on a succeeding maize crop [J].
Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel ;
Kuyper, Thom W. ;
Leeuwis, Cees ;
Abekoe, Mark K. ;
Cobbinah, Joseph ;
Sakyi-Dawson, Owuraku ;
Giller, Ken E. .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2008, 80 (03) :199-209
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INNOVATIONS IMPROVIN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, FAO Soils Bulletin
[4]   Symbiotic N2 fixation in 30 field-grown cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes in the Upper West Region of Ghana measured using 15N natural abundance [J].
Belane, Alphonsus K. ;
Dakora, Felix D. .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2010, 46 (02) :191-198
[5]  
Belder P., 2007, ICID C NOV 2007 JOH
[6]   Micro-basin tillage for grain sorghum production in semiarid areas of northern Ethiopia [J].
Brhane, G ;
Wortmann, CS ;
Mamo, M ;
Gebrekidan, H ;
Belay, A .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (01) :124-128
[7]   Effect of mulching on soil and plant water status, and the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a semi-arid environment [J].
Chakraboyty, Debashis ;
Nagarajan, Shantha ;
Aggarwal, Pramila ;
Gupta, V. K. ;
Tomar, R. K. ;
Garg, R. N. ;
Sahoo, R. N. ;
Sarkar, A. ;
Chopra, U. K. ;
Sarma, K. S. Sundara ;
Kalra, N. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2008, 95 (12) :1323-1334
[8]   CROPPING STRATEGIES, SOIL FERTILITY INVESTMENT AND LAND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BY SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN COMMUNAL AND RESETTLEMENT AREAS IN ZIMBABWE [J].
Cobo, J. G. ;
Dercon, G. ;
Monje, C. ;
Mahembe, P. ;
Gotosa, T. ;
Nyamangara, J. ;
Delve, R. J. ;
Cadisch, G. .
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 20 (05) :492-508
[9]  
Dar W.D., 2006, CROP PROT, DOI [10.1016/j.cropro.2006.4.029, DOI 10.1016/J.CROPRO.2006.4.029]
[10]   Crop residue mulching in tropical and semi-tropical countries: An evaluation of residue availability and other technological implications [J].
Erenstein, O .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2002, 67 (02) :115-133