Task Allocation in Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) Based on Task Characteristics and Agent Capability for Mold Assembly

被引:33
作者
Liau, Yee Yeng [1 ]
Ryu, Kwangyeol [1 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Busan, South Korea
来源
30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING (FAIM2021) | 2020年 / 51卷
关键词
Human-robot collaboration; Task Allocation; Work decomposition; Analytic Network Process (ANP); Genetic Algorithm; ASSIGNMENT; FRAMEWORK; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.026
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The involvement of repetitive motion with force and heavy component handling during the manual mold assembly causes an ergonomic problem that harms the musculoskeletal system on the human worker. This ergonomic problem can be eliminated using a robot. However, the traditional automation system is impractical to be implemented in the mold assembly because of the complexity of the customized mold structure. Hence, human-robot collaboration (HRC) systems became the potential solution to improve the working conditions with the assistance of a robot while adapting to the frequent change over in the mold assembly operation. In this paper, we propose a task allocation model for the HRC system that consists of three agents who are one human and two robots to cope with heavy part handling and the diversity of tasks in the mold assembly. First, we decompose the assembly operation into functional actions. Second, we evaluate the action assignment using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) based on the action characteristics and agent capability. Third, we allocate the functional action to the agents in the HRC work cell using the Genetic Algorithm (GA) to minimize the operation cycle time and maximize the agent capability. The outcome of this paper is to contribute to the expansion of the HRC system with one human and two robots in the mold assembly operation. In addition to the improvement in the ergonomic condition, the proposed task allocation model can achieve a wider variety of tasks assigned to robots with minimum tool change. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 186
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], about us
[2]   Optimizing human-robot task allocation using a simulation tool based on standardized work descriptions [J].
Baenziger, Timo ;
Kunz, Andreas ;
Wegener, Konrad .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2020, 31 (07) :1635-1648
[3]   Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction [J].
Beer, Jenay M. ;
Fisk, Arthur D. ;
Rogers, Wendy A. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2014, 3 (02) :74-99
[4]   Dynamic task classification and assignment for the management of human-robot collaborative teams in workcells [J].
Bruno, Giulia ;
Antonelli, Dario .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 98 (9-12) :2415-2427
[5]   Human-robot collaborative assembly: a use-case application [J].
Casalino, Andrea ;
Cividini, Filippo ;
Zanchettin, Andrea Maria ;
Piroddi, Luigi ;
Rocco, Paolo .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11) :194-199
[6]   Optimal Subtask Allocation for Human and Robot Collaboration Within Hybrid Assembly System [J].
Chen, Fei ;
Sekiyama, Kosuke ;
Cannella, Ferdinando ;
Fukuda, Toshio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 11 (04) :1065-1075
[7]  
Ding H., 2013, 44th International Symposium on Robotics (ISR), 2013, Seoul, P1, DOI [10.1109/ISR.2013.6695707, DOI 10.1109/ISR.2013.6695707]
[8]   Evaluating Cobots For Final Assembly [J].
Fast-Berglund, Asa ;
Palmkvist, Filip ;
Nyqvist, Per ;
Ekered, Sven ;
Akerman, Magnus .
6TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS (CATS), 2016, 44 :175-180
[9]   Safety Design and Development of a Human-Robot Collaboration Assembly Process in the Automotive Industry [J].
Heydaryan, Sahar ;
Bedolla, Joel Suaza ;
Belingardi, Giovanni .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (03)
[10]   Evolving Paradigms of Manufacturing: From Mass Production to Mass Customization and Personalization [J].
Hu, S. Jack .
FORTY SIXTH CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 2013, 2013, 7 :3-8