The Charlson Comorbidity Index: problems with use in epidemiological research

被引:25
作者
Drosdowskya, Allison [1 ]
Gougha, Karla [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Locked Bag 1,ABeckett St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Comorbidity; Multimorbidity; Survival; Methodology; Measurement; Charlson Comorbidity Index; CO-MORBIDITY; CANCER; VALIDATION; SURVIVAL; SCORE; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.022
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a highly cited and well established tool for measuring comorbidity in clinical research, but there are problems with its use in practice. Like most comorbidity summary measures, the CCI was developed to adjust for prognostic comorbidities in statistical models, particularly those exploring associations between a risk of death or survival time and other patient-related and disease-related factors. Despite this, the CCI is often used in cancer research to measure all comorbidity, or as a multimorbidity measure, and CCI scores are often used to assess the prognostic importance of multiple health conditions. In the latter case, it is not at all surprising that researchers report a significant association between CCI scores and a risk of death or survival times because CCI scores provide a summary of the presence or absence of a set of prognostic comorbidities. Advances in multimorbidity research require specific attention to the methods used to develop relevant indices. Published literature on the association between the comorbidity and risk of death or survival time should be interpreted with caution, especially if the CCI was used to provide a measure of comorbidities. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 177
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Stirland LE, 2020, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V368, DOI 10.1136/bmj.m160
  • [22] Associations between multimorbidity and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sullivan, Michael K.
    Rankin, Alastair J.
    Jani, Bhautesh D.
    Mair, Frances S.
    Mark, Patrick B.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [23] No paradox, no progress: inverse cancer comorbidity in people with other complex diseases
    Tabares-Seisdedos, Rafael
    Dumont, Nancy
    Baudot, Anais
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Climent, Joan
    Valencia, Alfonso
    Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto
    Vieta, Eduard
    Gomez-Beneyto, Manuel
    Martinez, Salvador
    Rubenstein, John L.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (06) : 604 - 608
  • [24] Defining Comorbidity: Implications for Understanding Health and Health Services
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Starfield, Barbara
    Sibbald, Bonnie
    Salisbury, Chris
    Roland, Martin
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 7 (04) : 357 - 363
  • [25] Van den Akker M., 1996, EUR J GEN PRACT, V2, P65, DOI [10.3109/13814789609162146, DOI 10.3109/13814789609162146]
  • [26] Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older
    Yancik, R
    Wesley, MN
    Ries, LAG
    Havlik, RJ
    Edwards, BK
    Yates, JW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (07): : 885 - 892
  • [27] The need for reappraisal of AIDS score weight of Charlson comorbidity index
    Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn
    Fuchs, Sandra Costa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (09) : 867 - 868