Computed tomography-based radiomics for predicting lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer

被引:19
作者
Li, Mou [1 ]
Jin, Yumei [1 ]
Rui, Jun [2 ]
Zhang, Yongchang [3 ]
Zhao, Yali [4 ]
Huang, Chencui [4 ]
Liu, Shengmei [1 ]
Song, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Radiol, West China Hosp, 37 GuoXue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Sci City Hosp, Dept Radiol, Mianyang 621054, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Seventh Peoples Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chengdu 610213, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Deepwise & League PHD Technol Co Ltd, Dept Res Collaborat, R&D Ctr, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
关键词
Radiomics; Computed tomography; Rectal cancer; Lymphovascular invasion; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; VASCULAR INVASION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110065
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop and externally validate a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics model for predicting lymphovascular invasion (LVI) before treatment in patients with rectal cancer (RC). Method: This retrospective study enrolled 351 patients with RC from three hospitals between March 2018 and March 2021. These patients were assigned to one of the following three groups: training set (n = 239, from hospital 1), internal validation set (n = 60, from hospital 1), and external validation set (n = 52, from hospitals 2 and 3). Large amounts of radiomics features were extracted from the intratumoral and peritumoral regions in the portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT images. The score of radiomics features (Rad-score) was calculated by performing logistic regression analysis following the L1-based method. A combined model (Rad-score + clinical factors) was developed in the training cohort and validated internally and externally. The models were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Of the 351 patients, 106 (30.2%) had an LVI + tumor. Rad-score (comprised of 22 features) was significantly higher in the LVI + group than in the LVI- group (0.60 +/- 0.17 vs. 0.42 +/- 0.19, P = 0.001). The combined model obtained good predictive performance in the training cohort (AUC = 0.813 [95% CI: 0.758-0.861]), with robust results in internal and external validations (AUC = 0.843 [95% CI: 0.726-0.924] and 0.807 [95% CI: 0.674-0.903]). Conclusions: The proposed combined model demonstrated the potential to predict LVI preoperatively in patients with RC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models Users' Guides to the Medical Literature [J].
Alba, Ana Carolina ;
Agoritsas, Thomas ;
Walsh, Michael ;
Hanna, Steven ;
Iorio, Alfonso ;
Devereaux, P. J. ;
McGinn, Thomas ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (14) :1377-1384
[2]   Extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: overview of imaging, histopathology, and clinical implications [J].
Ale Ali, Hamideh ;
Kirsch, Richard ;
Razaz, Suzan ;
Jhaveri, Aaditeya ;
Thipphavong, Seng ;
Kennedy, Erin D. ;
Jhaveri, Kartik S. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) :1-10
[3]   Interobserver agreement issues in radiology [J].
Benchoufi, M. ;
Matzner-Lober, E. ;
Molinari, N. ;
Jannot, A-S ;
Soyer, P. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2020, 101 (10) :639-641
[4]   Intramural and extramural vascular invasion in colorectal cancer Prognostic Significance and Quality of Pathology Reporting [J].
Betge, Johannes ;
Pollheimer, Marion J. ;
Lindtner, Richard A. ;
Kornprat, Peter ;
Schlemmer, Andrea ;
Rehak, Peter ;
Vieth, Michael ;
Hoefler, Gerald ;
Langner, Cord .
CANCER, 2012, 118 (03) :628-638
[5]   EMVI-positive stage II rectal cancer has similar clinical outcomes as stage III disease following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy [J].
Chand, M. ;
Bhangu, A. ;
Wotherspoon, A. ;
Stamp, G. W. H. ;
Swift, R. I. ;
Chau, I. ;
Tekkis, P. P. ;
Brown, G. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) :858-863
[6]   Comparative Oncologic Outcomes of Upper Third Rectal Cancers: A Meta-analysis [J].
Clancy, Cillian ;
Flanagan, Michael ;
Marinello, Franco ;
O'Neill, Brian D. ;
McNamara, Deborah ;
Burke, John P. .
CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2019, 18 (04) :E361-E367
[7]  
Compton CC, 2000, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V124, P979
[8]   Prognostic value of CT radiomics in evaluating lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer: Diagnostic performance based on different volumes of interest [J].
Ge, Yu-Xi ;
Xu, Wen-Bo ;
Wang, Zi ;
Zhang, Jun-Qin ;
Zhou, Xin-Yi ;
Duan, Shao-Feng ;
Hu, Shu-Dong ;
Fei, Bo-Jian .
JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 29 (04) :663-674
[9]   Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer [J].
Heo, Suk Hee ;
Kim, Jin Woong ;
Shin, Sang Soo ;
Jeong, Yong Yeon ;
Kang, Heoung-Keun .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (15) :4244-4255
[10]   Impact of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-matched Study [J].
Kataoka, Masahiro ;
Hirano, Yasumitsu ;
Ishii, Toshimasa ;
Kondo, Hiroka ;
Asari, Masahiro ;
Ishikawa, Shintaro ;
Kataoka, Atsuko ;
Fujii, Takatsugu ;
Shimamura, Satoshi ;
Yamaguchi, Shigeki .
IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (01) :525-531