Corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii is shoulder position dependent

被引:17
作者
Collins, Brandon Wayne [1 ]
Cadigan, Edward W. J. [1 ]
Stefanelli, Lucas [1 ]
Button, Duane C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ, Sch Human Kinet & Recreat, Human Neurophysiol Lab, St John, NF, Canada
[2] Mem Univ, Fac Med, BioMed Sci, St John, NF, Canada
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; transmastoid electrical stimulation; motor-evoked potential; cervicomedullary evoked potential; electro-myography; UPPER-EXTREMITY MUSCLES; MATCHED TONIC CONTRACTION; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; VOLUNTARY CONTRACTION; MOTOR CORTEX; SURFACE EMG; UPPER-LIMB; SPINAL EXCITABILITY; HUMAN MOTONEURONS; ELBOW FLEXORS;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00527.2017
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of shoulder position on corticospinal excitability (CSE) of the biceps brachii during rest and a 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Participants (n = 9) completed two experimental sessions with four conditions: 1) rest, 0 degrees shoulder flexion; 2) 10% MVC, 0 degrees shoulder flexion; 3) rest, 90 degrees shoulder flexion; and 4) 10% MVC, 90 degrees shoulder flexion. Transcranial magnetic, transmastoid electrical, and Erb's point stimulation were used to induce motorevoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEPs (CMEPs), and maximal muscle compound potentials (M-max), respectively, in the biceps brachii in each condition. At rest, MEP, CMEP, and M-max amplitudes increased (P < 0.01) by 509.7 +/- 118.3%, 113.3 +/- 28.3%, and 155.1 +/- 47.9%, respectively, at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. At 10% MVC, MEP amplitudes did not differ (P = 0.08), but CMEP and M-max amplitudes increased (P < 0.05) by 32.3 +/- 10.5% and 127.9 +/- 26.1%, respectively, at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. MEP/M-max increased (P < 0.01) by 224.0 +/- 99.1% at rest and decreased (P < 0.05) by 51.3 +/- 6.7% at 10% MVC at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. CMEP/M-max was not different (P < 0.22) at rest but decreased (P < 0.01) at 10% MVC by 33.6 +/- 6.1% at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. EMG increased (P < 0.001) by 8.3 +/- 2.0% at rest and decreased (P < 0.001) by 21.4 +/- 4.4% at 10% MVC at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. In conclusion, CSE of the biceps brachii was dependent on shoulder position, and the pattern of change was altered within the state in which it was measured. The position-dependent changes in M-max amplitude, EMG, and CSE itself all contribute to the overall change in CSE of the biceps brachii. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that when the shoulder is placed into two common positions for determining elbow flexor force and activation, corticospinal excitability (CSE) of the biceps brachii is both shoulder position and state dependent. At rest, when the shoulder is flexed from 0 degrees to 90 degrees, supraspinal factors predominantly alter CSE, whereas during a slight contraction, spinal factors predominantly alter CSE. Finally, the normalization techniques frequently used by researchers to investigate CSE may under- and overestimate CSE when shoulder position is changed.
引用
收藏
页码:3242 / 3251
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   Corticomotor excitability of arm muscles modulates according to static position and orientation of the upper limb [J].
Mogk, Jeremy P. M. ;
Rogers, Lynn M. ;
Murray, Wendy M. ;
Perreault, Eric J. ;
Stinear, James W. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 125 (10) :2046-2054
[32]  
Moon J, 2013, J PHYS THER SCI, V25, P1299, DOI 10.1589/jpts.25.1299
[33]  
Naito A, 1996, EXP BRAIN RES, V111, P483
[34]   Inhibitory projections from pronator teres to biceps brachii motoneurones in human [J].
Naito, A ;
Shindo, M ;
Miyasaka, T ;
Sun, YJ ;
Momoi, H ;
Chishima, M .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 121 (01) :99-102
[35]   Arm posture-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability are largely spinal in origin [J].
Nuzzo, James L. ;
Trajano, Gabriel S. ;
Barry, Benjamin K. ;
Gandevia, Simon C. ;
Taylor, Janet L. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 115 (04) :2076-2082
[36]   Arm-cycling sprints induce neuromuscular fatigue of the elbow flexors and alter corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii [J].
Pearcey, Gregory E. P. ;
Bradbury-Squires, David J. ;
Monks, Michael ;
Philpott, Devin ;
Power, Kevin E. ;
Button, Duane C. .
APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2016, 41 (02) :199-209
[37]   Differences in Supraspinal and Spinal Excitability during Various Force Outputs of the Biceps Brachii in Chronic- and Non-Resistance Trained Individuals [J].
Pearcey, Gregory E. P. ;
Power, Kevin E. ;
Button, Duane C. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05)
[38]   Distinct Influence of Hand Posture on Cortical Activity during Human Grasping [J].
Perez, Monica A. ;
Rothwell, John C. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 35 (12) :4882-4889
[39]   The effect of electrical stimulation of the corticospinal tract on motor units of the human biceps brachii [J].
Petersen, NT ;
Taylor, JL ;
Gandevia, SC .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2002, 544 (01) :277-284
[40]   Chronic resistance training enhances the spinal excitability of the biceps brachii in the non-dominant arm at moderate contraction intensities [J].
Philpott, Devin T. G. ;
Pearcey, Gregory E. P. ;
Forman, Davis ;
Power, Kevin E. ;
Button, Duane C. .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2015, 585 :12-16