Corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii is shoulder position dependent

被引:17
作者
Collins, Brandon Wayne [1 ]
Cadigan, Edward W. J. [1 ]
Stefanelli, Lucas [1 ]
Button, Duane C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ, Sch Human Kinet & Recreat, Human Neurophysiol Lab, St John, NF, Canada
[2] Mem Univ, Fac Med, BioMed Sci, St John, NF, Canada
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; transmastoid electrical stimulation; motor-evoked potential; cervicomedullary evoked potential; electro-myography; UPPER-EXTREMITY MUSCLES; MATCHED TONIC CONTRACTION; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; VOLUNTARY CONTRACTION; MOTOR CORTEX; SURFACE EMG; UPPER-LIMB; SPINAL EXCITABILITY; HUMAN MOTONEURONS; ELBOW FLEXORS;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00527.2017
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of shoulder position on corticospinal excitability (CSE) of the biceps brachii during rest and a 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Participants (n = 9) completed two experimental sessions with four conditions: 1) rest, 0 degrees shoulder flexion; 2) 10% MVC, 0 degrees shoulder flexion; 3) rest, 90 degrees shoulder flexion; and 4) 10% MVC, 90 degrees shoulder flexion. Transcranial magnetic, transmastoid electrical, and Erb's point stimulation were used to induce motorevoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEPs (CMEPs), and maximal muscle compound potentials (M-max), respectively, in the biceps brachii in each condition. At rest, MEP, CMEP, and M-max amplitudes increased (P < 0.01) by 509.7 +/- 118.3%, 113.3 +/- 28.3%, and 155.1 +/- 47.9%, respectively, at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. At 10% MVC, MEP amplitudes did not differ (P = 0.08), but CMEP and M-max amplitudes increased (P < 0.05) by 32.3 +/- 10.5% and 127.9 +/- 26.1%, respectively, at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. MEP/M-max increased (P < 0.01) by 224.0 +/- 99.1% at rest and decreased (P < 0.05) by 51.3 +/- 6.7% at 10% MVC at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. CMEP/M-max was not different (P < 0.22) at rest but decreased (P < 0.01) at 10% MVC by 33.6 +/- 6.1% at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. EMG increased (P < 0.001) by 8.3 +/- 2.0% at rest and decreased (P < 0.001) by 21.4 +/- 4.4% at 10% MVC at 90 degrees compared with 0 degrees. In conclusion, CSE of the biceps brachii was dependent on shoulder position, and the pattern of change was altered within the state in which it was measured. The position-dependent changes in M-max amplitude, EMG, and CSE itself all contribute to the overall change in CSE of the biceps brachii. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that when the shoulder is placed into two common positions for determining elbow flexor force and activation, corticospinal excitability (CSE) of the biceps brachii is both shoulder position and state dependent. At rest, when the shoulder is flexed from 0 degrees to 90 degrees, supraspinal factors predominantly alter CSE, whereas during a slight contraction, spinal factors predominantly alter CSE. Finally, the normalization techniques frequently used by researchers to investigate CSE may under- and overestimate CSE when shoulder position is changed.
引用
收藏
页码:3242 / 3251
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Changes in supraspinal and spinal excitability of the biceps brachii following brief, non-fatiguing submaximal contractions of the elbow flexors in resistance-trained males [J].
Aboodarda, Saied Jalal ;
Copithorne, David B. ;
Pearcey, Gregory E. P. ;
Button, Duane C. ;
Power, Kevin E. .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2015, 607 :66-71
[2]   A spinal pathway between synergists can modulate activity in human elbow flexor muscles [J].
Barry, Benjamin K. ;
Riley, Zachary A. ;
Pascoe, Michael A. ;
Enoka, Roger M. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 190 (03) :347-359
[3]   The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans [J].
Carroll, TJ ;
Riek, S ;
Carson, RG .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2002, 544 (02) :641-652
[4]  
Collins BW, 2017, PHYSIOL REP, V5, DOI 10.14814/phy2.13265
[5]   Premovement Changes in Corticospinal Excitability of the Biceps Brachii are Not Different Between Arm Cycling and an Intensity-Matched Tonic Contraction [J].
Copithorne, David B. ;
Forman, Davis A. ;
Power, Kevin E. .
MOTOR CONTROL, 2015, 19 (03) :223-241
[6]  
Di Lazzaro V, 1998, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V508, P625
[7]   Cortico-motoneuronal output to intrinsic hand muscles is differentially influenced by static changes in shoulder positions [J].
Dominici, F ;
Popa, T ;
Ginanneschi, F ;
Mazzocchio, R ;
Rossi, A .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 164 (04) :500-504
[8]   Motor unit recruitment and EMC power spectra during ramp contractions of a bifunctional muscle [J].
Dupont, L ;
Gamet, D ;
Pérot, C .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (04) :217-224
[9]   Resistance training induces supraspinal adaptations: evidence from movement-related cortical potentials [J].
Falvo, Michael J. ;
Sirevaag, Erik J. ;
Rohrbaugh, John W. ;
Earhart, Gammon M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 109 (05) :923-933
[10]   Isometric knee extensor fatigue following a Wingate test: peripheral and central mechanisms [J].
Fernandez-del-Olmo, M. ;
Rodriguez, F. A. ;
Marquez, G. ;
Iglesias, X. ;
Marina, M. ;
Benitez, A. ;
Vallejo, L. ;
Acero, R. M. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2013, 23 (01) :57-65