Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation

被引:33
作者
Albert, Mathias [1 ]
Buzan, Barry [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, Fac Sociol, D-4800 Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Int Relat, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
securitization theory; Copenhagen School; sectors; functional differentiation; sociology;
D O I
10.1177/0967010611418710
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
So far, securitization analysis has proceeded on the basis of an assumption that there are sectoral differences between securitization dynamics. However, sectors in this context were primarily seen as analytical 'lenses', as complexity-reducing cuts through a complex social reality. In this article, we first reflect on the ontological status of 'sectors'. Do they represent functionally differentiated realms of world politics or world society, or do sectors and functional realms need to be separated from one another clearly? After giving a short introduction to the notion of 'functional differentiation' in international relations and briefly reflecting on the ontological/analytical distinction, we scrutinize the relation between sectors and functionally differentiated realms of society. Although sectors hang together with functional differentiation, much depends on the version of functional differentiation theory used. In the communication theoretical version, securitization would be firmly located within the political system. References to functionally specific sectors would then contra Waltz - point not only towards functional differentiation between the political and other functionally defined realms of (international) society, but also towards ongoing functional differentiation within the (international) political system.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 425
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OBSERVING INT RELATI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, POLITIK WELTGESELLSC
[3]  
[Anonymous], TALCOTT PARSONS READ
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EVOLUTION INT SECURI
[5]  
[Anonymous], PEOPLE STATES FEAR
[6]   SPECIFICITY OF SCIENTIFIC FIELD AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS OF PROGRESS OF REASON [J].
BOURDIEU, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 1975, 14 (06) :19-47
[7]  
Buzan B., 1998, Security: a new framework for analysis, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781685853808
[8]   Differentiation: A sociological approach to international relations theory [J].
Buzan, Barry ;
Albert, Mathias .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2010, 16 (03) :315-337
[9]  
Buzan BarryRichard Little., 2000, INT SYSTEMS WORLD HI
[10]  
Habermas J., 1981, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1. Handlungsrationalitat und gesellschaftliche Rattionalisierung