A comparison of small monetary incentives to convert survey non-respondents: a randomized control trial

被引:22
作者
Griffin, Joan M. [1 ,2 ]
Simon, Alisha Baines [1 ]
Hulbert, Erin [1 ]
Stevenson, John [3 ]
Grill, Joseph P. [1 ]
Noorbaloochi, Siamak [1 ,2 ]
Partin, Melissa R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Minneapolis VA Hlth Syst, CCDOR, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Survey Ctr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; data collection; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; financial incentives; response rate; non-response; INCREASING RESPONSE RATES; LIMITED HEALTH LITERACY; SURVEY PARTICIPATION; RETURN RATES; MAIL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2288-11-81
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Maximizing response rates is critically important in order to provide the most generalizable and unbiased research results. High response rates reduce the chance of respondents being systematically different from non-respondents, and thus, reduce the risk of results not truly reflecting the study population. Monetary incentives are often used to improve response rates, but little is known about whether larger incentives improve response rates in those who previously have been unenthusiastic about participating in research. In this study we compared the response rates and cost-effectiveness of a $ 5 versus $ 2 monetary incentive accompanying a short survey mailed to patients who did not respond or refused to participate in research study with a face-to-face survey. Methods: 1,328 non-responders were randomly assigned to receive $ 5 or $ 2 and a short, 10-question survey by mail. Reminder postcards were sent to everyone; those not returning the survey were sent a second survey without incentive. Overall response rates, response rates by incentive condition, and odds of responding to the larger incentive were calculated. Total costs (materials, postage, and labor) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were also calculated and compared by incentive condition. Results: After the first mailing, the response rate within the $ 5 group was significantly higher (57.8% vs. 47.7%, p < .001); after the second mailing, the difference narrowed by 80%, resulting in a non-significant difference in cumulative rates between the $ 5 and $ 2 groups (67.3% vs. 65.4%, respectively, p = .47). Regardless of incentive or number of contacts, respondents were significantly more likely to be male, white, married, and 50-75 years old. Total costs were higher with the larger versus smaller incentive ($ 13.77 versus $ 9.95 per completed survey). Conclusions: A $ 5 incentive provides a significantly higher response rate than a $ 2 incentive if only one survey mailing is used but not if two survey mailings are used.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Effect of incentives and mailing features on online health program enrollment [J].
Alexander, Gwen L. ;
Divine, George W. ;
Couper, Mick P. ;
McClure, Jennifer B. ;
Stopponi, Melanie A. ;
Fortman, Kristine K. ;
Tolsma, Dennis D. ;
Strecher, Victor J. ;
Johnson, Christine Cole .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (05) :382-388
[2]  
*AM ASS PUBL OP RE, 2009, STAND DEF FIN DISP C, P6
[3]   Increasing response rates in a survey of Medicaid enrollees: The effect of a prepaid monetary incentive and mixed modes (mail and telephone) [J].
Beebe, TJ ;
Davern, ME ;
McAlpine, DD ;
Call, KT ;
Rockwood, TH .
MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (04) :411-414
[4]   Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population [J].
Chew, Lisa D. ;
Griffin, Joan M. ;
Partin, Melissa R. ;
Noorbaloochi, Siamak ;
Grill, Joseph P. ;
Snyder, Annamay ;
Bradley, Katharine A. ;
Nugent, Sean M. ;
Baines, Alisha D. ;
VanRyn, Michelle .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (05) :561-566
[5]   ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES - A METAANALYSIS [J].
CHURCH, AH .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1993, 57 (01) :62-79
[6]  
Dillman D. A., 2008, INTERNET MAIL MIXED
[7]  
Edwards P, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4]
[8]   Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires [J].
Edwards, P ;
Cooper, R ;
Roberts, I ;
Frost, C .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2005, 59 (11) :987-999
[9]   Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review [J].
Edwards, P ;
Roberts, I ;
Clarke, M ;
DiGuiseppi, C ;
Pratap, S ;
Wentz, R ;
Kwan, I .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7347) :1183-1185
[10]   No difference in response rate to a mailed survey among prostate cancer survivors using conditional versus unconditional incentives [J].
Evans, BR ;
Peterson, BL ;
Demark-Wahnefried, W .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2004, 13 (02) :277-278