Clinical Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System: Dosimetric Characterization

被引:123
作者
Feng, Steve Si Jia
Sechopoulos, Ioannis [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIATION; UK;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11111789
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To comprehensively characterize the dosimetric properties of a clinical digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) system for the acquisition of mammographic and tomosynthesis images. Materials and Methods: Compressible water-oil mixture phantoms were created and imaged by using the automatic exposure control (AEC) of the Selenia Dimensions system (Hologic, Bedford, Mass) in both DBT and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) mode. Empirical measurements of the x-ray tube output were performed with a dosimeter to measure the air kerma for the range of tube current-exposure time product settings and to develop models of the automatically selected x-ray spectra. A Monte Carlo simulation of the system was developed and used in conjunction with the AEC-chosen settings and spectra models to compute and compare the mean glandular dose (MGD) resulting from both imaging modalities for breasts of varying sizes and glandular compositions. Results: Acquisition of a single craniocaudal view resulted in an MGD ranging from 0.309 to 5.26 mGy in FFDM mode and from 0.657 to 3.52 mGy in DBT mode. For a breast with a compressed thickness of 5.0 cm and a 50% glandular fraction, a DBT acquisition resulted in an only 8% higher MGD than an FFDM acquisition (1.30 and 1.20 mGy, respectively). For a breast with a compressed thickness of 6.0 cm and a 14.3% glandular fraction, a DBT acquisition resulted in an 83% higher MGD than an FFDM acquisition (2.12 and 1.16 mGy, respectively). Conclusion: For two-dimensional-three-dimensional fusion imaging with the Selenia Dimensions system, the MGD for a 5-cm-thick 50% glandular breast is 2.50 mGy, which is less than the Mammography Quality Standards Act limit for a two-view screening mammography study. (C) RSNA, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] GEANT4-a simulation toolkit
    Agostinelli, S
    Allison, J
    Amako, K
    Apostolakis, J
    Araujo, H
    Arce, P
    Asai, M
    Axen, D
    Banerjee, S
    Barrand, G
    Behner, F
    Bellagamba, L
    Boudreau, J
    Broglia, L
    Brunengo, A
    Burkhardt, H
    Chauvie, S
    Chuma, J
    Chytracek, R
    Cooperman, G
    Cosmo, G
    Degtyarenko, P
    Dell'Acqua, A
    Depaola, G
    Dietrich, D
    Enami, R
    Feliciello, A
    Ferguson, C
    Fesefeldt, H
    Folger, G
    Foppiano, F
    Forti, A
    Garelli, S
    Giani, S
    Giannitrapani, R
    Gibin, D
    Cadenas, JJG
    González, I
    Abril, GG
    Greeniaus, G
    Greiner, W
    Grichine, V
    Grossheim, A
    Guatelli, S
    Gumplinger, P
    Hamatsu, R
    Hashimoto, K
    Hasui, H
    Heikkinen, A
    Howard, A
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 506 (03) : 250 - 303
  • [2] Geant4 developments and applications
    Allison, J
    Amako, K
    Apostolakis, J
    Araujo, H
    Dubois, PA
    Asai, M
    Barrand, G
    Capra, R
    Chauvie, S
    Chytracek, R
    Cirrone, GAP
    Cooperman, G
    Cosmo, G
    Cuttone, G
    Daquino, GG
    Donszelmann, M
    Dressel, M
    Folger, G
    Foppiano, F
    Generowicz, J
    Grichine, V
    Guatelli, S
    Gumplinger, P
    Heikkinen, A
    Hrivnacova, I
    Howard, A
    Incerti, S
    Ivanchenko, V
    Johnson, T
    Jones, F
    Koi, T
    Kokoulin, R
    Kossov, M
    Kurashige, H
    Lara, V
    Larsson, S
    Lei, F
    Link, O
    Longo, F
    Maire, M
    Mantero, A
    Mascialino, B
    McLaren, I
    Lorenzo, PM
    Minamimoto, K
    Murakami, K
    Nieminen, P
    Pandola, L
    Parlati, S
    Peralta, L
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2006, 53 (01) : 270 - 278
  • [3] Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Ikeda, Debra M.
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Ruschin, Mark
    Svahn, Tony
    Timberg, Pontus
    Tingberg, Anders
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (12) : 2817 - 2825
  • [4] Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment
    Boone, JM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 23 - 37
  • [5] Scatter/primary in mammography: Comprehensive results
    Boone, JM
    Lindfors, KK
    Cooper, VN
    Seibert, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (10) : 2408 - 2416
  • [6] Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography
    Boone, JM
    Fewell, TR
    Jennings, RJ
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) : 1863 - 1874
  • [7] Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary x-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data
    Boone, JM
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 869 - 875
  • [8] Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols
    Dance, D. R.
    Young, K. C.
    van Engen, R. E.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (02) : 453 - 471
  • [9] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance Study
    Gur, David
    Abrams, Gordon S.
    Chough, Denise M.
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Hakim, Christiane M.
    Perrin, Ronald L.
    Rathfon, Grace Y.
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    Zuley, Margarita L.
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (02) : 586 - 591
  • [10] HAMMERSTEIN GR, 1979, RADIOLOGY, V130, P485