Disability and preventive cancer screening: Results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey

被引:83
作者
Ramirez, A
Farmer, GC
Grant, D
Papachristou, T
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Calif Hlth Interview Survey, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Sociol & Hlth Serv, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2005.066118
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. We sought to evaluate preventive cancer screening compliance among adults with disability in California. Methods. We used data from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey to compare disabled and nondisabled adults for differences in preventive cancer screening behaviors. Compliance rates for cancer screening tests (mammography, Papanicolaou test, prostate-specific antigen, sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy, and fecal occult blood test) between the 2 subpopulations were evaluated. Results. Women with disabilities were 17% (Papanicolaou tests) and 13% (mammograms) more likely than women without disabilities to report noncompliance with cancer screening guidelines. Interactions between disability and reports of a doctor recommendation on cervical cancer screening were significant; women with disabilities had a lower likelihood of receiving a recommendation. Men with disabilities were 19% less likely than men without disabilities to report a prostate-specific antigen test within the last 3 years. Conclusions. Despite higher rates of health insurance and more stable access to care, significant differences in the use of preventive cancer screening services by persons with disabilities persist. Symmetries in health promotion behaviors among the subpopulations suggest that individual health behaviors may be secondary to structural and/or clinical factors underpinning the differences found.
引用
收藏
页码:2057 / 2064
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   REVISITING THE BEHAVIORAL-MODEL AND ACCESS TO MEDICAL-CARE - DOES IT MATTER [J].
ANDERSEN, RM .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1995, 36 (01) :1-10
[2]  
Andriacchi R, 1997, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V76, pS17
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[4]   Disability, chronic illness, and risk selection [J].
Batavia, AI ;
DeJong, G .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (04) :546-552
[5]   Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional coverage: Perceptions of health care among beneficiaries with disabilities [J].
Beatty, PW ;
Dhont, KR .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (08) :1009-1017
[6]  
Bockenek WL, 1998, REHABILITATION MED P, P905
[7]  
BRANDT EN, 1997, COMMITTEE ASSESSING
[8]   Effects of community factors on access to ambulatory care for lower-income adults in large urban communities [J].
Brown, ER ;
Davidson, PL ;
Yu, HJ ;
Wyn, R ;
Andersen, RM ;
Becerra, L ;
Razack, N .
INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2004, 41 (01) :39-56
[9]  
BROWN ER, 2004, HLTH POLICY RES, P1
[10]   Breast carcinoma treatment received by women with disabilities compared with women without disabilities [J].
Caban, ME ;
Nosek, MA ;
Graves, D ;
Esteva, FJ ;
McNeese, M .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (05) :1391-1396