The effect of emotion and time pressure on risk decision-making

被引:69
作者
Hu, Yixin [1 ]
Wang, Dawei [2 ]
Pang, Kaiyuan [3 ]
Xu, Guangxing [1 ]
Guo, Jinhong [1 ]
机构
[1] E China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
neuroeconomics model; emotion; time pressure; risk decision-making; POSITIVE AFFECT; MOOD; REGRET; PERCEPTION; JUDGMENT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2014.910688
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Emotion and time pressure are two important factors affecting risk decision-making. This study explored the interaction of emotion and time pressure on risk decision-making by adopting 3 (emotion state: positive emotion, negative emotion, and control group) x 2 (time constraint: high time constraint and no time constraint) between-subject experiment design. The results showed that (1) both emotion and time pressure exerted significant effect on risk decision-making (generally, positive emotion renders participants more risk prone than negative emotion, and high time pressure promotes people more risk seeking than no time pressure); (2) time pressure polarized the effects of different emotions on risk decision-making. As effects of emotions were polarized under high time pressure, two distinct cognitive pathways may function in human decision-making. Based on our experimental result and previous neuroeconomic works, we proposed a novel dual cognitive pathways model to explain phenomenon in the current article.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 650
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Survey of decision field theory [J].
Busemeyer, JR ;
Diederich, A .
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2002, 43 (03) :345-370
[2]   Positive affect and decision frame in negotiation [J].
Carnevale, Peter J. .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2008, 17 (01) :51-63
[3]  
Caruso E. M., 1998, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V74, P1464
[4]   Positive Emotional Context Eliminates the Framing Effect in Decision-Making [J].
Cassotti, Mathieu ;
Habib, Marianne ;
Poirel, Nicolas ;
Aite, Ania ;
Houde, Olivier ;
Moutier, Sylvain .
EMOTION, 2012, 12 (05) :926-931
[5]   Regret in decision making [J].
Connolly, T ;
Zeelenberg, M .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (06) :212-216
[6]   Effects of expectations for different reward magnitudes on neuronal activity in primate striatum [J].
Cromwell, HC ;
Schultz, W .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 89 (05) :2823-2838
[7]   Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain [J].
De Martino, Benedetto ;
Kumaran, Dharshan ;
Seymour, Ben ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5787) :684-687
[8]   Decision-making competence in everyday life: The roles of general cognitive styles, decision-making styles and personality [J].
Dewberry, Chris ;
Juanchich, Marie ;
Narendran, Sunitha .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2013, 55 (07) :783-788
[9]   On the relevance of Cognitive Continuum Theory and quasirationality for understanding management judgment and decision making [J].
Dhami, Mandeep K. ;
Thomson, Mary E. .
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 30 (04) :316-326
[10]   Eliciting risk and time preferences under induced mood states [J].
Drichoutis, Andreas C. ;
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIO-ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 :18-27