INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE EDUCATION AS A REVISION STRATEGY

被引:13
作者
Sotakova, Ivana [1 ]
Ganajova, Maria [1 ]
Babincakova, Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pavol Jozef Safarik Univ Kosice, Fac Sci, Dept Didact Chem, Srobarova 2, Kosice, Slovakia
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Dept Teaching & Didact Chem, Albertov 6, Prague 2, Czech Republic
来源
JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION | 2020年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
chemistry education; cognitive processes; confirmation inquiry; secondary school; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; SECONDARY-SCHOOL; INSTRUCTION; CHEMISTRY; DISCOVERY; TEACHER; WORK; MOTIVATION; VIEWS;
D O I
10.33225/jbse/20.19.499
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The research aim was to identify the effect of revising the thematic unit "Changes in Chemical Reactions" using IBSE (based on confirmation inquiry) in the 8th grade of secondary school. This thematic unit is taught in chemistry lessons in the 2nd term of the 7th grade. A set of activities verified by a piece of pilot research was used to implement IBSE based on confirmation inquiry using the SE Educational Model. The research was performed in ten Slovak secondary schools during the 1st term of the 2017/2018 school year. This research employed the quasi-experimental methodology involving pre-test-post-test two-group design. The research sample consisted of 292 8th grade students. They were divided randomly into a control (n=149) and experimental (n=143) group, and the intervention took place during 10 lessons. Cognitive tests based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy were used to measure students' knowledge and skills before and after revision. The results indicate that using IBSE (based on confirmation inquiry) in the revision phase is more effective than teaching without using IBSE in terms of developing conceptual understanding. It affects the lower and higher cognitive processes (understanding, application, and analysis) and stimulates learning mainly in students with lower academic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 513
页数:15
相关论文
共 88 条
[31]   Inquiry-Based Professional Development: What does it take to support teachers in learning about inquiry and nature of science? [J].
Capps, Daniel K. ;
Crawford, Barbara A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2013, 35 (12) :1947-1978
[32]  
Colburn A., 2000, SCI SCOPE, V23, P42, DOI DOI 10.1021/ED300137Z
[33]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[34]  
Eisenkraft A., 2003, Sci. Teach, V70, P56, DOI DOI 10.1002/TEA.3660010112
[35]  
Fradd S.H., 2002, BILING RES J, V25, P479
[36]   Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Furtak, Erin Marie ;
Seidel, Tina ;
Iverson, Heidi ;
Briggs, Derek C. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 82 (03) :300-329
[37]  
Goodrum D., 2007, Australian school science education: National action plan 2008-2012, Volume, V1
[38]  
Harlan W., 2004, Primary Science Review, V83, P17
[39]  
Harlen W., 2013, Assessment Inquiry-Based Science Education: Issues in Policy and Practice
[40]   Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories [J].
Hofstein, A ;
Navon, O ;
Kipnis, M ;
Mamlok-Naaman, R .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2005, 42 (07) :791-806