Assessing species climatic requirements beyond the realized niche: some lessons mainly from tree species distribution modelling

被引:84
作者
Booth, Trevor H. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
climate change; fundamental niche; species extinction; species vulnerability; forest; species distribution model; POTENTIAL RANGE; EXTINCTION RISK; BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; THREATS;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-017-2107-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Almost all climate change studies of plants and animals adopt an 'equilibrium assumption' that analyses of natural distributions provide reliable estimates of species climatic requirements. Yet commercial forestry trials around the world have shown that many tree species can grow successfully under climatic conditions somewhat different from those of their natural distributions. Under climate change it is reasonable to assume that a long-lived tree species, already well-established at particular sites, may be able to display some of the climatic adaptability shown in trials outside its natural distribution. The purpose of this paper is to outline how some species distribution modelling (SDM) and ecological niche modelling (ENM) studies have estimated species climatic requirements beyond those shown by conventional analyses of just their natural distributions, and to show how recent developments are facilitating these analyses. Some of the earliest SDM studies of trees demonstrated the desirability of assessing species climatic requirements using data from outside, as well as within, their natural distributions. In recent years, with the advent of large biodiversity databases and some revised SDM analysis methods, there has been a revival of interest in measuring species climatic requirements using data from beyond their realized niches. It is recommended that at least for tree species, natural distribution data, and where possible results from plantings beyond natural distributions, should be analysed in climate change studies. When this is not possible, some alternative methods of estimating species climatic requirements are identified and some of their advantages and disadvantages are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 271
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Anderson R.P., 2016, FINAL REPORT TASK GR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ARS CLIM CHANG 2014
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, EUCALYPT DOMESTICATI, DOI DOI 10.1086/418790
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1978, An Introduction to Population Ecology
[5]   Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches [J].
Austin, Mike .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 200 (1-2) :1-19
[6]   The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling [J].
Barve, Narayani ;
Barve, Vijay ;
Jimenez-Valverde, Alberto ;
Lira-Noriega, Andres ;
Maher, Sean P. ;
Peterson, A. Townsend ;
Soberon, Jorge ;
Villalobos, Fabricio .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (11) :1810-1819
[7]   Towards a national bio-environmental data facility: experiences from the Atlas of Living Australia [J].
Belbin, Lee ;
Williams, Kristen J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2016, 30 (01) :108-125
[8]   Plants' native distributions do not reflect climatic tolerance [J].
Bocsi, Tierney ;
Allen, Jenica M. ;
Bellemare, Jesse ;
Kartesz, John ;
Nishino, Misako ;
Bradley, Bethany A. .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2016, 22 (06) :615-624
[9]   Species distribution models may misdirect assisted migration: insights from the introduction of Douglas-fir to Europe [J].
Boiffin, Juliette ;
Badeau, Vincent ;
Breda, Nathalie .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (02) :446-457
[10]   Impacts of climate change on eucalypt distributions in Australia: an examination of a recent study [J].
Booth, T. H. .
AUSTRALIAN FORESTRY, 2017, 80 (04) :208-215