Healthcare leaders' views on successful quality improvement initiatives and context

被引:7
作者
Barson, Stuart [1 ]
Doolan-Noble, Fiona [2 ]
Gray, Jonathon [3 ]
Gauld, Robin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Otago Business Sch, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Gen Practice & Rural Hlth, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Counties Manukau Hlth, Ko Awatea, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Healthcare; Quality improvement; Context; Engagement; MUSIQ; Patients and families; UNDERSTANDING SUCCESS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/JHOM-10-2016-0191
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the contextual factors contributing to the sustainability of healthcare quality improvement (QI) initiatives. Design/methodology/approach - Themes from semi-structured interviews with international healthcare leaders are compared with Kaplan and Provost et al.'s (2012) model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ). Critical success factors within these themes are shown in detail. Findings - The interviews provide a rich source of information on critical success factors. The themes largely correspond with MUSIQ, reinforcing its robustness. An important factor emerging from the interviews was the importance of engagement with patients and families in QI, and this needs consideration in seeking to understand context in QI. Research limitations/implications - Interview participants represent a limited set of western countries and health systems. Their experiences may not hold true in other settings. Practical implications - The detail on critical success factors provides QI practitioners with guidance on designing and implementing sustainable initiatives. Originality/value - Including consideration of contextual factors for engagement with patients and families in frameworks for context in QI appears to be an original idea that will add value to such frameworks. Researchers in patient engagement are starting to address contextual factors and connections should be made with this work.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement [J].
Armstrong, Natalie ;
Herbert, Georgia ;
Aveling, Emma-Louise ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary ;
Martin, Graham .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2013, 16 (03) :E36-E47
[2]   First steps in qualitative data analysis: transcribing [J].
Bailey, Julia .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 25 (02) :127-131
[3]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117
[4]   Improvement, trust, and the healthcare workforce [J].
Berwick, DM .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (06) :448-452
[5]   Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness [J].
Bodenheimer, T ;
Wagner, EH ;
Grumbach, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (14) :1775-1779
[6]  
Bryman A., 2012, SOCIAL RES METHODS
[7]  
Deming W., 1986, OUT CRISIS
[8]  
Doolan-Noble F., 2016, 161 U OT CTR HLTH SY
[9]   Using a Malcolm Baldrige framework to understand high-performing clinical microsystems [J].
Foster, Tina C. ;
Johnson, Julie K. ;
Nelson, Eugene C. ;
Batalden, Paul B. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 16 (05) :334-341
[10]  
Fulop N., 2015, CONTEXT SUCCESSFUL Q