Non-intrusive imprecise stochastic simulation by line sampling

被引:32
作者
Song, Jingwen [1 ,3 ]
Valdebenito, Marcos [2 ]
Wei, Pengfei [1 ,3 ]
Beer, Michael [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lu, Zhenzhou [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, West Youyi Rd 127, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Obras Civiles, Av Espana 1680, Valparaiso, Chile
[3] Leihniz Univ Hannover, Inst Risk & Reliabil, Callinstr 34, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[4] Univ Liverpool, Inst Risk & Uncertainty, Peach St, Liverpool L69 7ZF, Merseyside, England
[5] Tongji Univ, Int Joint Res Ctr Engn Reliabil & Stochast Mech, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Imprecise probability models; Line sampling; Sensitivity analysis; Aleatory uncertainty; Epistemic uncertainty; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; HIGH DIMENSIONS; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101936
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The non-intrusive imprecise stochastic simulation (NISS) is a general framework for the propagation of imprecise probability models and analysis of reliability. The most appealing character of this methodology framework is that, being a pure simulation method, only one precise stochastic simulation is needed for implementing the method, and the requirement of performing optimization analysis on the response functions can be elegantly avoided. However, for rare failure events, the current NISS methods are still computationally expensive. In this paper, the classical line sampling developed for precise stochastic simulation is injected into the NISS framework, and two different imprecise line sampling (ILS) methods are developed based on two different interpretations of the classical line sampling procedure. The first strategy is devised based on the set of hyperplanes introduced by the line sampling analysis, while the second strategy is developed based on an integral along each individual line. The truncation errors of both methods are measured by sensitivity indices, and the variances of all estimators are derived for indicating the statistical errors. A test example and three engineering problems of different types are introduced for comparing and demonstrating the effectiveness of the two ILS methods.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Estimation of the lower and upper bounds on the probability of failure using subset simulation and random set theory [J].
Alvarez, Diego A. ;
Uribe, Felipe ;
Hurtado, Jorge E. .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2018, 100 :782-801
[2]   Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation [J].
Au, SK ;
Beck, JL .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2001, 16 (04) :263-277
[3]   Imprecise probabilities in engineering analyses [J].
Beer, Michael ;
Ferson, Scott ;
Kreinovich, Vladik .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 37 (1-2) :4-29
[4]   Comparative study of HDMRs and other popular metamodeling techniques for high dimensional problems [J].
Chen, Liming ;
Wang, Hu ;
Ye, Fan ;
Hu, Wei .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2019, 59 (01) :21-42
[5]   Advanced Line Sampling for efficient robust reliability analysis [J].
de Angelis, Marco ;
Patelli, Edoardo ;
Beer, Michael .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2015, 52 :170-182
[6]   Reliability analysis with Metamodel Line Sampling [J].
Depina, Ivan ;
Le, Thi Minh Hue ;
Fenton, Gordon ;
Eiksund, Gudmund .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2016, 60 :1-15
[7]  
Faes M., 2019, ARCH COMPUT METHOD E, P1
[8]   A multivariate interval approach for inverse uncertainty quantification with limited experimental data [J].
Faes, Matthias ;
Broggi, Matteo ;
Patelli, Edoardo ;
Govers, Yves ;
Mottershead, John ;
Beer, Michael ;
Moens, David .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 118 :534-548
[9]   Strategies for finding the design point in non-linear finite element reliability analysis [J].
Haukaas, Terje ;
Kiureghian, Armen Der .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2006, 21 (02) :133-147
[10]   IMPROVEMENT OF 2ND-ORDER RELIABILITY ESTIMATES BY IMPORTANCE SAMPLING [J].
HOHENBICHLER, M ;
RACKWITZ, R .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1988, 114 (12) :2195-2199