A watershed water quality evaluation model using data mining as an alternative to physical watershed models

被引:6
作者
Cho, Yongdeok [1 ]
机构
[1] K Water Inst & Asia Water Council, 1689 Beon Gil 125, Daejeon 305730, South Korea
来源
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY | 2016年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
data mining; statistics; water quality evaluation model based on data mining (WQEMD); watershed characteristics; LAND-USE; COVER; ZONE;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2015.180
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a data mining (DM)-based approach to developing a watershed water quality evaluation model (water quality evaluation model based on data mining (WQEMD)) as an alternative to physical watershed models. Three DM techniques (i.e. model tree, artificial neural network, and radial basis function) were employed to develop a WQEMD based on watershed characteristics (e.g. hydrology, geology, and land usage). To represent watershed characteristics, three cases and ten scenarios were considered. The three cases were defined as (1) the size (area) allocation of sub-watersheds, (2) the watershed imperviousness ratio, and (3) the combination of the area and imperviousness ratio. The ten scenarios were composed of the following parameters; impervious, pervious, land usage, rainfall, slope. The best WQEMDs were subsequently developed using statistics (correlation coefficient, mean-absolute error, root mean-squared error, and root relative-squared error). In addition, the WQEMDs developed were then verified using the Geum-Sum-Youngsan River watershed. The percentage difference of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (T-N) and total phosphorus (T-P) were 30.6%, 23.44%, and 2.79%, respectively. The results show that a WQEMD developed in this way is effective and can be used in place of a physical watershed model and is useful to aid in determining areas having the best potential for successful remediation.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 714
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Amirhossien F., 2015, Am. J. Clim. Change, V4, P203, DOI DOI 10.4236/AJCC.2015.43016
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD
[3]   An application of contingent valuation and decision tree analysis to water quality improvements [J].
Atkins, Jonathan P. ;
Burdon, Daryl ;
Allen, James H. .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2007, 55 (10-12) :591-602
[4]   Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning [J].
Brabec, E ;
Schulte, S ;
Richards, PL .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2002, 16 (04) :499-514
[5]   Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze river [J].
Chau, KW ;
Wu, CL ;
Li, YS .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2005, 10 (06) :485-491
[6]  
CHO YD, 2014, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V15, P236
[7]   Development of SPAWM: selection program for available watershed models [J].
Cho, Yongdeok ;
Roesner, Larry A. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 70 (03) :387-396
[8]   Impervious surface as an indicator of pH and specific conductance in the urbanizing coastal zone of New Jersey, USA [J].
Conway, Tenley M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 85 (02) :308-316
[9]  
CWP, 2005, URB SUBW REST MAN 1
[10]  
Daniel E. B., 2011, The Open Hydrology Journal, V5, P26, DOI 10.2174/1874378101105010026