A dimension range representation (DRR) measure for self-organizing maps

被引：4

作者：

Clark, Stephanie ^{[1
]}

Sisson, Scott. A. ^{[1
]}

Sharma, Ashish ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Math & Stat, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

来源：

PATTERN RECOGNITION | 2016年 / 53卷

关键词：

Self-organizing maps; Quality; Error measure; Dimension; Coverage; Map size; Map shape; Extreme values; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; RUNOFF; RIVER;

D O I：

10.1016/j.patcog.2015.11.002

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

A common tool in exploratory data analysis, the self-organizing map, or SOM, is used for clustering and visualisation to discover patterns in large, high-dimensional data sets. The output map may be interpreted to gain an understanding of the structure of the original data set, correlations between variables, and the characteristics the clusters formed by placing the data on the map. However, if the map does not represent all dimensions of the data in an informative way, map interpretation may be misleading. Currently there is no measure of how well a SOM represents each dimension of a data set, and therefore how descriptive the map vectors are of the full structure of the data they represent. A dimension range representation (DRR) measure is proposed to quantify how well represented each dimension of the data set is by the map vectors of the SOM. This can be used to choose between different map size and shape options that could potentially represent a specific data set. Through examples, it is demonstrated how the DRR measure is used to inform the choice of map size and shape, leading to more informative insight into the original data set through examination of the output map. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：276 / 286

页数：11

共 50 条

[31] Fast Self-Organizing Maps Training
Giobergia, Flavio
Baralis, Elena
2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2019, : 2257 - 2266
[32] On the stationarity in some self-organizing maps
Hoshino, M
Kimura, Y
Kaku, I
ICIM' 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, : 754 - 760
[33] Lateral interactions in self-organizing maps
Viviani, R
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS - ICANN 2002, 2002, 2415 : 920 - 926
[34] Fault tolerance of self-organizing maps
Bernard Girau
Cesar Torres-Huitzil
Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32 : 17977 - 17993
[35] Self-Organizing Maps with supervised layer
Platon, Ludovic
Zehraoui, Farida
Tahi, Fariza
2017 12TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS AND LEARNING VECTOR QUANTIZATION, CLUSTERING AND DATA VISUALIZATION (WSOM), 2017, : 161 - 168
[36] A Survey of Hardware Self-Organizing Maps
Jovanovic, Slavisa
Hikawa, Hiroomi
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2023, 34 (11) : 8154 - 8173
[37] Fault tolerance of self-organizing maps
Girau, Bernard
Torres-Huitzil, Cesar
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2020, 32 (24): : 17977 - 17993
[38] Self-organizing maps for representing structures
Farkas, I
STATE OF THE ART IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, : 27 - 32
[39] Incremental learning with self-organizing maps
Gepperth, Alexander
Karaoguz, Cem
2017 12TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS AND LEARNING VECTOR QUANTIZATION, CLUSTERING AND DATA VISUALIZATION (WSOM), 2017, : 153 - 160
[40] Self-organizing maps for texture classification
Nedyalko Petrov
Antoniya Georgieva
Ivan Jordanov
Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 22 : 1499 - 1508

← 1 2 3 4 5 →