Rebalancing Spatial Attention: Endogenous Orienting May Partially Overcome the Left Visual Field Bias in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation

被引:9
作者
Smigasiewicz, Kamila [1 ]
Hasan, Gabriel Sami [1 ]
Verleger, Rolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
关键词
EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION; ALPHA-BAND; N2PC COMPONENT; UNILATERAL NEGLECT; EEG; OSCILLATIONS; STIMULUS; SEARCH; BLINK;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_01032
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In dynamically changing environments, spatial attention is not equally distributed across the visual field. For instance, when two streams of stimuli are presented left and right, the second target (T2) is better identified in the left visual field (LVF) than in the right visual field (RVF). Recently, it has been shown that this bias is related to weaker stimulus-driven orienting of attention toward the RVF: The RVF disadvantage was reduced with salient task-irrelevant valid cues and increased with invalid cues. Here we studied if also endogenous orienting of attention may compensate for this unequal distribution of stimulus-driven attention. Explicit information was provided about the location of T1 and T2. Effectiveness of the cue manipulation was confirmed by EEG measures: decreasing alpha power before stream onset with informative cues, earlier latencies of potentials evoked by T1-preceding distractors at the right than at the left hemisphere when T1 was cued left, and decreasing T1- and T2-evoked N2pc amplitudes with informative cues. Importantly, informative cues reduced (though did not completely abolish) the LVF advantage, indicated by improved identification of right T2, and reflected by earlier N2pc latency evoked by right T2 and larger decrease in alpha power after cues indicating right T2. Overall, these results suggest that endogenously driven attention facilitates stimulus-driven orienting of attention toward the RVF, thereby partially overcoming the basic LVF bias in spatial attention.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J VIS, DOI DOI 10.1167/13.3.23.[
[2]   Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes [J].
Asanowicz, Dariusz ;
Smigasiewicz, Kamila ;
Verleger, Rolf .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[3]   On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length [J].
Benwell, Christopher S. Y. ;
Harvey, Monika ;
Thut, Gregor .
NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 86 :370-380
[4]   Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention [J].
Berger, A ;
Henik, A ;
Rafal, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (02) :207-221
[5]   Prestimulus Neural Oscillations Inhibit Visual Perception via Modulation of Response Gain [J].
Chaumon, Maximilien ;
Busch, Niko A. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 26 (11) :2514-2529
[6]   Spatial attention and conscious perception: Interactions and dissociations between and within endogenous and exogenous processes [J].
Chica, Ana B. ;
Botta, Fabiano ;
Lupianez, Juan ;
Bartolomeo, Paolo .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2012, 50 (05) :621-629
[7]  
CORBETTA M, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P1202
[8]   The Attentional Blink Reveals Serial Working Memory Encoding: Evidence from Virtual and Human Event-related Potentials [J].
Craston, Patrick ;
Wyble, Brad ;
Chennu, Srivas ;
Bowman, Howard .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 21 (03) :550-566
[9]   Revisiting unilateral neglect [J].
Danckert, J ;
Ferber, S .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2006, 44 (06) :987-1006
[10]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72