Implementation of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for public drinking water supplies: Systematic review

被引:56
|
作者
Owens, Christopher E. L. [1 ,2 ]
Angles, Mark L. [3 ]
Cox, Peter T. [2 ]
Byleveld, Paul M. [4 ]
Osborne, Nicholas J. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Rahman, Md Bayzid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Water Corp, Parramatta, NSW 2124, Australia
[3] Water Angles Consulting, Vaucluse, NSW 2030, Australia
[4] NSW Hlth, Water Unit, Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[6] Univ Exeter, Royal Cornwall Hosp, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Truro TR1 3HD, England
关键词
Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA); Systematic review; Drinking water; Distributed water supply; SURFACE-WATER; GASTROINTESTINAL ILLNESS; INFECTION RISK; HEALTH-RISK; DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; CRYPTOSPORIDIUM; GIARDIA; QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2020.115614
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the more than 15 years since its introduction, quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) has become a widely used technique for assessing population health risk posed by waterborne pathogens. However, the variation in approaches taken for QMRA in relation to drinking water supply is not well understood. This systematic review identifies, categorises, and critically synthesises peer-reviewed and academic case studies of QMRA implementation for existing distributed public drinking water supplies. Thirty-nine English-language, peer-reviewed and academic studies published from 2003 to 2019 were identified. Key findings were synthesised in narrative form. The overall designs of the included studies varied widely, as did the assumptions used in risk calculation, especially in relation to pathogen dose. There was also substantial variation in the degree to which the use of location-specific data weighed with the use of assumptions when performing risk calculation. In general, the included studies' complexity did not appear to be associated with greater result certainty. Factors relating to pathogen dose were commonly influential on risk estimates whereas dose-response parameters tended to be of low relative influence. In two of the included studies, use of the 'susceptible fraction' factor was inconsistent with recognised guidance and potentially led to the underestimation of risk. While approaches and assumptions used in QMRA need not be standardised, improvement in the reporting of QMRA results and uncertainties would be beneficial. It is recommended that future authors consider the water supply QMRA reporting checklist developed for the current review. Consideration of the broad types of uncertainty relevant to QMRA is also recommended. Policy-makers should consider emergent discussion on acute microbial health-based targets when setting normative guidelines. The continued representation of QMRA case studies within peer-reviewed and academic literature would also enhance future implementation. Further research is needed on the optimisation of QMRA resourcing given the application context. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for drinking water sources in developing countries
    Amatobi, D. A.
    Agunwamba, J. C.
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [2] Improved quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for drinking water sources in developing countries
    D. A. Amatobi
    J. C. Agunwamba
    Applied Water Science, 2022, 12
  • [3] Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Public Drinking Water in China
    CAO Sheng Kui
    JIANG Yan Yan
    YUAN Zhong Ying
    YIN Jian Hai
    XU Meng
    XUE Jing Bo
    TANG Lin Hua
    SHEN Yu Juan
    CAO Jian Ping
    Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34 (06) : 493 - 498
  • [4] Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Public Drinking Water in China
    Cao Sheng Kui
    Jiang Yan Yan
    Yuan Zhong Ying
    Yin Jian Hai
    Xu Meng
    Xue Jing Bo
    Tang Lin Hua
    Shen Yu Juan
    Cao Jian Ping
    BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 34 (06) : 493 - 498
  • [5] Practical applications of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for water safety plans
    Smeets, P. W. M. H.
    Rietveld, L. C.
    van Dijk, J. C.
    Medema, G. J.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (06) : 1561 - 1568
  • [6] Synergy between quantitative microbial source tracking (qMST) and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA): A review and prospectus
    Zhang, Qian
    Gallard, Javier
    Wu, Baolei
    Harwood, Valerie J.
    Sadowsky, Michael J.
    Hamilton, Kerry A.
    Ahmed, Warish
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 130
  • [7] Current assumptions for quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) of Norovirus contamination of drinking water catchments due to recreational activities: an update
    Deere, Dan
    Ryan, Una
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2022, 20 (10) : 1543 - 1557
  • [8] Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for water re-use via aquifers
    Page, Declan
    Toze, Simon
    MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 2009, 30 (01) : 20 - 21
  • [9] Review of generic screening level assumptions for quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for estimating public health risks from Australian drinking water sources contaminated with Cryptosporidium by recreational activities
    Ryan, U.
    Hill, Kelly
    Deere, Dan
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 220
  • [10] Incorporating parameter uncertainty into Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA)
    Donald, Margaret
    Mengersen, Kerrie
    Toze, Simon
    Sidhu, Jatinder P. S.
    Cook, Angus
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2011, 9 (01) : 10 - 26