Taking into Account the Human Factor in Regional Innovation Systems and Policies

被引:24
作者
Martinidis, G. [1 ]
Komninos, N. [2 ]
Carayannis, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Architecture, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Business, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Innovation; Regional development; Innovation policy; Human capital; Human resources; Social capital; Psychological capital; STRATEGIC KNOWLEDGE ARBITRAGE; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SMART SPECIALIZATION; SOCIAL INNOVATION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CULTURE; SERENDIPITY; DIMENSIONS; PERSONALITY; CREATIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-021-00722-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Innovation is considered a key driver for economic growth and is usually studied in the form of systems, with the regional level being arguably the most important. Despite constantly improving technological infrastructure, the human-related aspects of innovation are still the most important part of the innovation process. The human factor in innovation essentially consists of three components: (1) human capital, which refers to education, knowledge, and skills; (2) social capital, which refers to the strength of social links and social coherence; and (3) psychological capital, which refers to peoples' values, attitudes, and behaviors. The research findings confirmed this view and showed which specific indicators of the three types of capital had a significant impact on innovation output. A new, extended regional innovation scoreboard emphasizing the human factor, is proposed. Also, based on the findings, and bearing in mind current EU innovation policies, a number of measures are proposed in order to suggest "more human" smart specialization policies in order to increase innovation in European regions and coherence between them.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 879
页数:31
相关论文
共 131 条
[71]  
Hollanders H., 2016, ENTERPRISE IND MAGAZ, DOI DOI 10.2873/84730
[72]  
Hollanders H., 2014, Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014 European Innovation Scoreboard 2013-2014 report
[73]  
Howaldt J., 2010, Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends, International Monitoring (IMO)
[74]   The weakness of postcommunist civil society [J].
Howard, MM .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2002, 13 (01) :157-169
[75]  
Inglehart R., 2020, Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies, DOI 10.1515/9780691214429
[76]  
Investopedia, 2016, HUMAN CAPITAL
[77]  
Jimenez D., 2008, European Journal of Innovation Management, V11, P389, DOI DOI 10.1108/14601060810889026
[78]  
Kaasa, 2013, RETHINKING DIVERSITY, P83
[79]   How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries [J].
Kaasa, Anneli ;
Vadi, Maaja .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 19 (07) :583-604
[80]  
Komninos, 2018, ONLINE S3 MECH KNOWL