An evaluation of contemporary China's land use policy - The Link Policy: A case study from Ezhou, Hubei Province

被引:26
作者
Cheng, Long [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Gregory [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Yan [2 ]
Searle, Glen [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia
[3] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Dept Nat Resources Management & Environm Sci, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Architecture Design & Planning, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Link policy; Policy evaluation; Urbanisation; Land use; Ezhou; POVERTY ALLEVIATION RESETTLEMENT; 3 GORGES DAM; CONSTRUCTION LAND; FARMLAND CONVERSION; URBAN EXPANSION; CULTIVATED LAND; RURAL CHINA; CONSOLIDATION; RIGHTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104423
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Economic reform in China has resulted in rapid urbanisation over the past three decades, changing the urban and rural landscape dramatically. A large amount of farmland was developed, leading to conflict between construction demand and farmland protection. In response, the "Link Policy" was proposed in 2005 that seeks to concurrently preserve farmland while providing for urban expansion through land exchange. The effectiveness of the Link Policy has not been systematically investigated. The purpose of this study is to analyse and evaluate outcomes of the Link Policy objectives from both a participant and investigator's interpretive perspective. Ezhou, the first experimental city to implement the Link Policy in Hubei Province in central China, was selected as a case study area. Eight different communities in Ezhou were visited and 160 semi-structured interviews were conducted with resettled rural residents in March 2016. A combination of interviews and investigator field observations were used to evaluate the Link Policy objectives. The results show that participants recognize and support improving rural living conditions and coordinating urban-rural development, but the Link Policy failed to achieve the objectives of preserving farmland, protecting farmers' land use rights and interests, and facilitating agricultural production. Participants perceived concentrated resettlement communities to be more efficient in land use compared to more expansive rural settlements, but vacant apartments for commercial use in resettlement areas account for a large proportion of land suggesting inefficiency in the land exchanges. We suggest policy changes to achieve more successful implementation of the Link Policy.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Advani M., 2009, URBANIZATION DISPLAC
[2]  
Alterman R, 2010, TAKINGS INT COMP PER
[3]  
[Anonymous], DISPLACEMENT RESETTL
[4]   Realizing China's urban dream [J].
Bai, Xuemei ;
Shi, Peijun ;
Liu, Yansui .
NATURE, 2014, 509 (7499) :158-160
[6]   NEW HOMES, NEW LIVES - THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF RESETTLEMENT ON TIBETAN NOMADS (YUSHU PREFECTURE, QINGHAI PROVINCE, PRC) [J].
Bauer, Kenneth .
NOMADIC PEOPLES, 2015, 19 (02) :209-220
[7]  
Boyce B. N., 1975, Real Estate Appraisal Terminology
[8]  
Brown D., 2000, LAND ACQUISITION EXA
[9]   Local "Land finance" in China's urban expansion: Challenges and solutions [J].
Cao, Guangzhong ;
Feng, Changchun ;
Tao, Ran .
CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2008, 16 (02) :19-30
[10]  
Chan N., 2003, International Real Estate Review, V6, P136, DOI DOI 10.53383/100050