Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda®) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer

被引:255
|
作者
O'Shaughnessy, JA
Blum, J
Moiseyenko, V
Jones, SE
Miles, D
Bell, D
Rosso, R
Mauriac, L
Osterwalder, B
Burger, HU
Laws, S
机构
[1] US Oncol, Baylor Sammons Canc Ctr, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] Petrov Res Inst, St Petersburg, Russia
[3] Guys Hosp, Imperial Canc Res Fund, Breast Canc Biol Unit, London SE1 9RT, England
[4] Royal N Shore Hosp, Dept Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Ist Sci Studio & Cura Tumori, Genoa, Italy
[6] Inst Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
[7] F Hoffmann La Roche & Co Ltd, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[8] Quintiles, Strasbourg, France
关键词
breast cancer; capecitabine; CMF; first-line; oral fluoropyrimidine;
D O I
10.1023/A:1012281104865
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Oral capecitabine was evaluated in terms of overall response rate, safety, and tolerability as first-line therapy in women aged greater than or equal to 55 years with advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Patients and methods: Ninety-five patients were randomized (2 : 1) to either intermittent oral capecitabine 1255 mg/m(2) twice daily (two weeks' treatment followed by a one-week rest period) or intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]) administered every three weeks. Results: The overall response rate in the capecitabine group was 30% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 19%-43%), including three complete responses (5%). The response rate observed in the CMF group was 16% (95% CI: 5%-33%), with no complete responses. Median time to disease progression was 4.1 months with capecitabine and 3.0 months with CMF. Survival was similar in the two treatment groups (median 19.6 months with capecitabine, 17.2 months with CMF). The safety profiles were different for capecitabine and CMF. However, both regimens were generally well tolerated and treatment interruption and/or dose modification was effective in managing toxicities associated with capecitabine. Alopecia and myelosuppression were rare in patients receiving capecitabine while diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome were more common. Treatment interruption and/or individual dose adjustment of capecitabine was required in 34% of patients and was generally effective in managing adverse events. Treatment was stopped owing to toxicity in 16% of patients in the capecitabine arm. The incidence of deaths during or within 28 days of stopping study treatment was 8% and 6% in the capecitabine and CMF arms, respectively. Conclusions: An oral, twice-daily regimen of capecitabine is effective and well tolerated when used as first-line chemotherapy in older patients (greater than or equal to 55 years) with advanced/metastatic breast cancer, and is suitable for outpatient therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1247 / 1254
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil, and high dose leucovorin (NFL) versus intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma
    Hainsworth, JD
    Jolivet, J
    Birch, R
    Hopkins, LG
    Greco, FA
    CANCER, 1997, 79 (04) : 740 - 748
  • [2] Bendamustine prolongs progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): a phase III prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of bendamustine hydrochloride, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (BMF) versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as first-line treatment of MBC
    von Minckwitz, G
    Chernozemsky, I
    Sirakova, L
    Chilingirov, P
    Souchon, R
    Marschner, N
    Kleeberg, U
    Tsekov, C
    Fritze, D
    Thomssen, C
    Stuart, N
    Vermorken, JB
    Loibl, S
    Merkle, K
    Kaufmann, M
    ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2005, 16 (08) : 871 - 877
  • [3] First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer:: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin
    Cassidy, J
    Twelves, C
    Van Cutsem, E
    Hoff, P
    Bajetta, E
    Boyer, M
    Bugat, R
    Burger, U
    Garin, A
    Graeven, U
    McKendrick, J
    Maroun, J
    Marshall, J
    Osterwalder, B
    Pérez-Manga, G
    Rosso, R
    Rougier, P
    Schilsky, RL
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) : 566 - 575
  • [4] Sixteen years follow-up results of a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in stage III breast cancer: GOCS experience
    José Pablo Leone
    Julieta Leone
    Carlos Teodoro Vallejo
    Juan Eduardo Pérez
    Alberto Omar Romero
    Mario Raul Machiavelli
    Luis Romero Acuña
    María Ester Domínguez
    Mario Langui
    Hebe Margot Fasce
    Bernardo Amadeo Leone
    Eduardo Ortiz
    Julián Iturbe
    Ariel Osvaldo Zwenger
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 143 : 313 - 323
  • [5] Sixteen years follow-up results of a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in stage III breast cancer: GOCS experience
    Leone, Jose Pablo
    Leone, Julieta
    Teodoro Vallejo, Carlos
    Eduardo Perez, Juan
    Omar Romero, Alberto
    Raul Machiavelli, Mario
    Romero Acuna, Luis
    Ester Dominguez, Maria
    Langui, Mario
    Margot Fasce, Hebe
    Leone, Bernardo Amadeo
    Ortiz, Eduardo
    Iturbe, Julian
    Osvaldo Zwenger, Ariel
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 143 (02) : 313 - 323
  • [6] Results of a phase I trial of intravenous vinorelbine plus oral capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer
    Favier, Laure
    Isambert, Nicolas
    Zanetta, Sylvie
    Ferrant, Ernmanuelle
    Mayer, Francoise
    Chauffert, Bruno
    Fumoleau, Pierre
    Garnier, Jerome
    Biville, Fabienne
    Coudert, Bruno
    BREAST, 2008, 17 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [7] Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial
    Kang, Y. -K.
    Kang, W. -K.
    Shin, D. -B.
    Chen, J.
    Xiong, J.
    Wang, J.
    Lichinitser, M.
    Guan, Z.
    Khasanov, R.
    Zheng, L.
    Philco-Salas, M.
    Suarez, T.
    Santamaria, J.
    Forster, G.
    McCloud, P. I.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (04) : 666 - 673
  • [8] ML17032 trial: capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer
    Ryu, Min-Hee
    Kang, Yoon-Koo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2009, 9 (12) : 1745 - 1751
  • [9] A multicentre, open-label phase II study of Irinotecan, capecitabine (Xeloda®), and Oxaliplatin (IXO) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma
    Arthur Lui
    Karen Mulder
    Christine Brezden-Masley
    Michael Vickers
    Jose Monzon
    Hagen Kennecke
    Rakesh Goel
    Larissa Vos
    Sunita Ghosh
    Horia Marginean
    Anthony Fields
    Jean Maroun
    Jennifer Spratlin
    Investigational New Drugs, 2018, 36 : 674 - 682
  • [10] A multicentre, open-label phase II study of Irinotecan, capecitabine (Xeloda®), and Oxaliplatin (IXO) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma
    Lui, Arthur
    Mulder, Karen
    Brezden-Masley, Christine
    Vickers, Michael
    Monzon, Jose
    Kennecke, Hagen
    Goel, Rakesh
    Vos, Larissa
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Marginean, Horia
    Fields, Anthony
    Maroun, Jean
    Spratlin, Jennifer
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2018, 36 (04) : 674 - 682