Support for Polyarchy in the Americas

被引:74
作者
Carlin, Ryan E. [2 ]
Singer, Matthew M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Polit Sci, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
support for democracy; polyarchy; modernization theory; political culture; presidential approval; Latin America; POLITICAL STABILITY; DEMOCRACY; PERFORMANCE; ADJECTIVES; GOVERNMENT; TRANSITION; VALUES; MASS;
D O I
10.1177/0010414011407471
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This study measures support for the basic rights, liberties, and practices associated with polyarchy in 12 Latin American democracies. Specifically, it identifies five profiles of support for polyarchy's core values and norms-public contestation, inclusive participation, limits on executive authority, and institutional checks and balances. Although citizens who fit the polyarch profile accept all of polyarchy's principles, those who fit one of the four mixed support profiles (power constrainer, power checker, power delegator, power restrainer) accept only some of them while rejecting other core democratic principles. Long-run factors emphasized by modernization and cultural theories (e.g., education, wealth, political engagement) are closely associated with the polyarch support profile. However, short-range performance factors (e.g., economic perceptions; crime, discrimination, and corruption victimization; voting for losing presidential candidates; presidential approval) may better explain why citizens fit one particular mixed profile over another and particularly explain willingness to delegate authority to the executive at the expense of other institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1526
页数:27
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]  
Bratton Michael., 2005, Public Opinion, democracy, and market reform in Africa
[12]  
CAMP RA, 2001, CITIZEN VIEWS DEMOCR, P3
[13]  
Carnaghan E., 2007, Out of Order: Russian Political Values in an Imperfect World
[14]  
Carrion J.F., 2008, Challenges to Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean, P21
[15]   Democracy with adjectives - Conceptual innovation in comparative research [J].
Collier, D ;
Levitsky, S .
WORLD POLITICS, 1997, 49 (03) :430-&
[16]  
CONVERSE PE, 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT
[17]  
COPPEDGE M, APPROACHING IN PRESS
[18]   Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness [J].
Coppedge, Michael ;
Alvarez, Angel ;
Maldonado, Claudia .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2008, 70 (03) :632-647
[19]  
Dahl Robert A., 1971, POLYARCHY PARTICIPAT
[20]  
Diamond L, 2008, FOREIGN AFF, V87, P36