Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling

被引:152
作者
Dubus, IG [1 ]
Brown, CD [1 ]
Beulke, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Ctr Ecochem, Silsoe MK45 4DT, Beds, England
关键词
uncertainty; sensitivity; Monte Carlo; probabilistic; pesticide; model; leaching;
D O I
10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00362-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is worldwide interest in the application of probabilistic approaches to pesticide fate models to account for uncertainty in exposure assessments. The first steps in conducting a probabilistic analysis of any system are: 0) to identify where the uncertainties come from; and (ii) to pinpoint those uncertainties that are likely to affect most of the predictions made. This article aims at addressing those two points within the context of exposure assessment for pesticides through a review of the different sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling. The extensive listing of sources of uncertainty clearly demonstrates that pesticide fate modelling is laced with uncertainty. More importantly, the review suggests that the probabilistic approaches, which are typically being deployed to account for uncertainty in the pesticide fate modelling, such as Monte Carlo modelling, ignore a number of key sources of uncertainty, which are likely to have a significant effect on the prediction of environmental concentrations for pesticides (e.g. model error, modeller subjectivity). Future research should concentrate on quantifying the impact these uncertainties have on exposure assessments and on developing procedures that enable their integration within probabilistic assessments. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 72
页数:20
相关论文
共 195 条
[1]   Non-linearity and error in modelling soil processes [J].
Addiscott, TM ;
Tuck, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2001, 52 (01) :129-138
[2]   Differences in sorption behaviour of carbaryl and phosalone in soils from Australia, Pakistan, and the United Kingdom [J].
Ahmad, R ;
Kookana, RS ;
Alston, AM ;
Bromilow, RH .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (04) :893-908
[3]   Syringe filtration as a source of error in pesticide residue analysis in environmental samples [J].
Ahmad, R ;
Kookana, RS ;
Alston, AM .
BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 66 (03) :313-318
[4]   Modeling pesticide losses from diffuse sources in Germany [J].
Bach, M ;
Huber, A ;
Frede, HG .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 44 (07) :189-196
[5]  
BAILAR JC, 1988, SCI INFERENCES ENV P
[6]   SOIL TYPE AND HERBICIDES ADSORPTION [J].
BARRIUSO, E ;
CALVET, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 46 (1-3) :117-128
[7]   Spatial and temporal variation of isoproturon residues and associated sorption/desorption parameters at the field scale [J].
Beck, AJ ;
Harris, GL ;
Howse, KR ;
Johnston, AE ;
Jones, KC .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1996, 33 (07) :1283-1295
[8]   On the problem of model validation for predictive exposure assessments [J].
Beck, MB ;
Ravetz, JR ;
Mulkey, LA ;
Barnwell, TO .
STOCHASTIC HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS, 1997, 11 (03) :229-254
[9]   WATER-QUALITY MODELING - A REVIEW OF THE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
BECK, MB .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1987, 23 (08) :1393-1442
[10]   STUDY OF SORPTION PROCESSES OF SELECTED PESTICIDES ON SOILS AND CERAMIC POROUS CUPS USED FOR SOIL SOLUTION SAMPLING [J].
BELTRAN, J ;
HERNANDEZ, F ;
LOPEZ, FJ ;
MORELL, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 58 (1-4) :287-303