Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis

被引:52
作者
Massie, Lara W. [1 ]
Zakaria, Hesham Mostafa [1 ]
Schultz, Lonni R. [2 ]
Basheer, Azam [1 ]
Buraimoh, Morenikeji Ayodele [3 ]
Chang, Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Neurosurg, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Orthoped, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
spondylolisthesis; minimally invasive; TLIF; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; lordotic cage; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; LORDOSIS MISMATCH; PELVIC INCIDENCE; FOLLOW-UP; IN-SITU; LEVEL; SURGERY; RESTORATION; REDUCTION; POSTERIOR;
D O I
10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The inability to significantly improve sagittal parameters has been a limitation of minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Traditional cages have a limited capacity to restore lordosis. This study evaluates the use of a crescent-shaped articulating expandable cage (Altera) for MIS TLIF. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 1-and 2-level MIS TLIF. Radiographic outcomes included differences in segmental and lumbar lordosis, disc height, evidence of fusion, and any endplate violations. Clinical outcomes included the numeric rating scale for leg and back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low-back pain. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients underwent single-level MIS TLIF, and 5 underwent 2-level MIS TLIF. The mean age was 63.1 years, with 64% women. On average, spondylolisthesis was corrected by 4.3 mm (preoperative = 6.69 mm, postoperative = 2.39 mm, p < 0.001), the segmental angle was improved by 4.94 degrees (preoperative = 5.63 degrees, postoperative = 10.58 degrees, p < 0.001), and segmental height increased by 3.1 mm (preoperative = 5.09 mm, postoperative = 8.19 mm, p < 0.001). At 90 days after surgery the authors observed the following: a smaller postoperative sagittal vertical axis was associated with larger changes in back pain at 90 days (r = -0.558, p = 0.013); a larger decrease in spondylolisthesis was associated with greater improvements in ODI and back pain scores (r = -0.425, p = 0.043, and r = -0.43, p = 0.031, respectively); and a larger decrease in pelvic tilt (PT) was associated with greater improvements in back pain (r = -0.548, p = 0.043). For the 1-year PROs, the relationship between the change in PT and changes in ODI and numeric rating scale back pain were significant (r = 0.612, p = 0.009, and r = -0.803, p = 0.001, respectively) with larger decreases in PT associated with larger improvements in ODI and back pain. Overall for this study there was a 96% fusion rate. Fourteen patients were noted to have endplate violation on intraoperative fluoroscopy during placement of the cage. Only 3 of these had progression of their subsidence, with an overall subsidence rate of 6% (3 of 49) visible on postoperative CT. CONCLUSIONS The use of this expandable, articulating, lordotic, or hyperlordotic interbody cage for MIS TLIF provides a significant restoration of segmental height and segmental lordosis, with associated improvements in sagittal balance parameters. Patients treated with this technique had acceptable levels of fusion and significant reductions in pain and disability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery [J].
Brodano, Giovanni B. ;
Martikos, Konstantinos ;
Lolli, Francesco ;
Gasbarrini, Alessandro ;
Cioni, Alfredo ;
Bandiera, Stefano ;
Di Silvestre, Mario ;
Boriani, Stefano ;
Greggi, Tiziana .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (10) :E559-E564
[2]   Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis [J].
Cheng, Xiaofei ;
Zhang, Kai ;
Sun, Xiaojiang ;
Zhao, Changqing ;
Li, Hua ;
Ni, Bin ;
Zhao, Jie .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (08) :1127-1133
[3]  
de Kunder SL, 2017, SPINE J
[4]  
Djurasovic Mladen O, 2008, Orthopedics, V31, P546
[5]  
Epstein Nancy E, 2016, Surg Neurol Int, V7, pS96, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.174896
[6]   Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with or without reduction: A comparative study [J].
Fan, Guoxin ;
Zhang, Hailong ;
Guan, Xiaofei ;
Gu, Guangfei ;
Wu, Xinbo ;
Hu, Annan ;
Gu, Xin ;
He, Shisheng .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 33 :111-118
[7]   Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: In Situ Versus Reduction [J].
Fan, Guoxin ;
Gu, Guangfei ;
Zhu, Yanjie ;
Guan, Xiaofei ;
Hu, Annan ;
Wu, Xinbo ;
Zhang, Hailong ;
He, Shisheng .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 90 :580-+
[8]   Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion In degenerative spondylolisthesis: An attempt to evaluate the superiority of one method over the other [J].
Ghasemi, Amir Abbas .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 150 :1-5
[9]  
Ghogawala Z, 2016, NEW ENGL J MED, V375, P600, DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1606502
[10]   Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis [J].
Ghogawala, Zoher ;
Dziura, James ;
Butler, William E. ;
Dai, Feng ;
Terrin, Norma ;
Magge, Subu N. ;
Coumans, Jean-Valery C. E. ;
Harrington, J. Fred ;
Amin-Hanjani, Sepideh ;
Schwartz, J. Sanford ;
Sonntag, Volker K. H. ;
Barker, Fred G., II ;
Benzel, Edward C. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (15) :1424-1434