Interventions to improve rates of post-mortem examination after stillbirth

被引:29
作者
Stock, Sarah J. [1 ]
Goldsmith, Lesley [2 ]
Evans, Margaret J. [3 ]
Laing, Ian A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Div Reprod & Dev Sci, Simpson Ctr Reprod Hlth, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Borders Gen Hosp, Melrose TD6 9BS, Roxburgh, Scotland
[3] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Pathol, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Simpson Ctr Reprod Hlth, Dept Neonatol, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Stillbirth; Post-mortem; Autopsy; Perinatal mortality; Intrauterine death; Fetal loss; PERINATAL AUTOPSY; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.022
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Despite recognition of the value of post-mortem examination following stillbirth, worldwide rates have declined since the early 1990s. There is a paucity of published evidence relating to factors that can improve post-mortem uptake. The aim of this study was to assess post-mortem rates following stillbirth and identify trends in the past 18 years that may have affected acceptance of the investigation. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Results: Sharp declines in post-mortems coincided with publicity surrounding unlawful organ retention. Although nationally post-mortem rates have continued to fall, in our unit there was recovery in postmortem rates. This increase was associated with implementation of policies to promote the uptake of perinatal post-mortem, including availability of specialist perinatal pathologists, education in the value of post-mortem, and senior staff involvement in counselling regarding the procedure. Conclusion: The need to improve uptake of post-mortem examination following stillbirth is internationally recognized. The results of this study suggest that increased local availability of specialist perinatal pathologists, who can support education in the value of post-mortem, along with senior staff obtaining consent, may help achieve this goal. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 150
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V113, P748, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819e9ee2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CONF ENQ MAT CHILD H
[3]   Value of perinatal autopsy [J].
Faye-Petersen, OM ;
Guinn, DA ;
Wenstrom, KD .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (06) :915-920
[4]   Value of the perinatal autopsy: Critique [J].
Gordijn, SJ ;
Erwich, JJHM ;
Khong, TY .
PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 5 (05) :480-488
[5]   Reclassification of unexplained stillbirths using clinical practice guidelines [J].
Headley, Elizabeth ;
Gordon, Adrienne ;
Jeffery, Heather .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 49 (03) :285-289
[6]   Foetal and neonatal autopsy rates and use of tissue for research: The influence of 'organ retention' controversy and new consent process [J].
Khong, T. Y. ;
Tanner, Alison R. .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2006, 42 (06) :366-369
[7]   Provider attitudes about gaining consent for perinatal autopsy [J].
Khong, TY ;
Turnbull, D ;
Staples, A .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (06) :994-998
[8]  
Kock K F, 2003, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V13, P403, DOI 10.1080/jmf.13.6.403.407
[9]   Stillbirth and Bereavement: Guidelines for Stillbirth Investigation [J].
Leduc, Line ;
Farine, Dan ;
Armson, B. Anthony ;
Brunner, Monica ;
Crane, Joan ;
Delisle, Marie-France ;
Gagnon, Robert ;
Keenan-Lindsay, Lisa ;
Morin, Valerie ;
Mundle, Robert W. ;
Scheider, Carol ;
Van Aerde, John .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2006, 28 (06) :540-545
[10]   VALUE OF PERINATAL NECROPSY EXAMINATION [J].
PORTER, HJ ;
KEELING, JW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1987, 40 (02) :180-184