Green industry development in China: An index based assessment from perspectives of both current performance and historical effort

被引:51
作者
Yuan, Qianqian [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Dongwei [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Feng [3 ]
Luken, Ralph [4 ]
Saieed, Abu [4 ]
Wang, Ke [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[4] United Nations Ind Dev Org, POB 400, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
[5] Sustainable Dev Res Inst Econ & Soc Beijing, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Green industry assessment; Green indicators; Sustainable development goals; Green industry policies; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; PROVINCES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119457
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green economy has become mainstream in the world's development, and green industry development is becoming increasingly urgent especially in China for achieving its sustainable development goals. Through combining the actual demand of China's green industry development and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this study established a comprehensive index system, including economic growth, social stability, and environmental friendliness. Different from previous studies that only consider one index in evaluation of the green industry development level, this study proposes an evaluation framework with two composite indices from two perspectives, to comprehensively assess the green industry development level of 18 China's high-industrialized provinces during the period of 2011-2015. One is the Green Industry Performance (GIPer) index to assess the current performance, and the other is Green Industry Progress (GIPro) index to reflect the historical effort in green transformation. As far as we know, our comprehensive assessment combining the two perspectives is the first study of this kind in the research field of green industry development. Then, by comparing the values of GIPer and GIPro of each province with the median values, all evaluated provinces are classified as advanced or backward in terms of current performance, and classified as active or passive in terms of the progress in green transformation. Four categories (in combination of these two indices), which are "advanced-active", "advanced-passive", "backward-active" and "backward-passive", are determined. In each category, the key indicators restricting for green industry development of every province are identified, and corresponding policy recommendation is put forward to enhance green industry development. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Green TFP Intensity Impact on Sustainable East Asian Productivity Growth [J].
Ahmed, Elsadig M. .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2012, 42 (01) :67-78
[2]  
Allenby BradenR., 1994, GREENING IND ECOSYST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1972, LIMITS GROWTH
[4]  
[Anonymous], REPORT CHINAS GREEN
[5]  
[Anonymous], Monitoring progress-OECD indicators Re
[6]  
[Anonymous], CHINA IND EC
[7]  
[Anonymous], THEORY PRACTICE SUST
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2011, [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1063/1.3159605
[9]   Measuring green productivity growth for China's manufacturing sectors: 1991-2000 [J].
Cao, Jing .
ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2007, 21 (04) :425-451
[10]  
Carson R., 2009, Silent spring, P1962